Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear vs. Reality

2005-12-19 Thread kitts
On Monday 19 December 2005 06:43 IST, Curtis L. Olson wrote: So here are the video links: http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Special/Rascal110_2/Movies/chapt1- divx6.avi http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Special/Rascal110_2/Movies/chapt3- divx6.avi They are about 8-9 minutes each.  

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear vs. Reality

2005-12-19 Thread Curtis L. Olson
kitts wrote: The videos are really cool! Just one question... Did you have to do a lot of adjustment for the synthetic and reality to match? Except fr maybe the FOV and the angle in the synthetic view. We haven't spent much time calibrating the two. My brother did the video editing and

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear vs. Reality

2005-12-18 Thread Curtis L. Olson
I've posted a few little blurbs about the UAV project I'm involved in, so here's another one. First a word of explanation. We have an R/C plane with a camera looking 45 degrees down. The airplane also has an expensive sensor that spits out location (lon, lat, elevation) and attitude (pitch,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear vs. Reality

2005-12-18 Thread Buchanan, Stuart
--- Curtis L. Olson wrote: I've posted a few little blurbs about the UAV project I'm involved in, so here's another one. First a word of explanation. We have an R/C plane with a camera looking 45 degrees down. The airplane also has an expensive sensor that spits out location (lon,

RE: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear vs. Reality

2005-12-18 Thread Jim Alberico
From Curt: Subject: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear vs. Reality I've posted a few little blurbs about the UAV project I'm involved in, so here's another one. First a word of explanation. We have an R/C plane with a camera looking 45 degrees down. The airplane also has an expensive sensor