Jim Wilson wrote:
Maybe we could just name the xml wrappers in Aircraft with the words alpha or
beta (something shorter than experimental or underdevelopement).
For example:
b707-alpha-jsbsim.xml
Would indicate that the model for the boeing 707 is an unfinished JSBsim model.
Hmm, how about not
On Wed 10. September 2003 16:26, you wrote:
Curtis Olson wrote:
This is all very true, especially in the open source world. However,
speaking as the flightgear project maintainer, I get the sense that we
are starting to collect a number of half finished (or just barely
started) aircraft
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Curtis Olson wrote:
This is all very true, especially in the open source world. However,
speaking as the flightgear project maintainer, I get the sense that we
are starting to collect a number of half finished (or just barely
started) aircraft that
[Duplicate of what I sent to Jsbsim-devel list since I forgot to cc
flightgear-devel!]
On 9/10/03 at 10:20 AM Jon S Berndt wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:26:04 +0200
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. But that's really a FlightGear issue.
What I've been thinking of is setting up a
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 15:26, Erik Hofman wrote:
Curtis Olson wrote:
This is all very true, especially in the open source world. However,
speaking as the flightgear project maintainer, I get the sense that we
are starting to collect a number of half finished (or just barely
