Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery DB (Was: San Jose)

2005-11-08 Thread George Patterson
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 09:19 +0200, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: I would like to see all new scenery object contributions to end up in the scenery database. However, the last time I wanted to sync the base package and the DB there were more than one objects in the same space because of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery DB (Was: San Jose)

2005-11-07 Thread Josh Babcock
Erik Hofman wrote: Paul Surgeon wrote: Since it's in the default San Francisco area you can submit it to Erik or Curt or you could sumbit it to the FlightGear scenery database. http://fgfsdb.stockill.org/ I'm just not sure if Curt will include objects from the FG scenery db into the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery DB (Was: San Jose)

2005-11-07 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
I would like to see all new scenery object contributions to end up in the scenery database. However, the last time I wanted to sync the base package and the DB there were more than one objects in the same space because of automatic object generation. btw it looks pretty cute sometimes ---

[Flightgear-devel] Scenery DB (Was: San Jose)

2005-11-05 Thread Erik Hofman
Paul Surgeon wrote: Since it's in the default San Francisco area you can submit it to Erik or Curt or you could sumbit it to the FlightGear scenery database. http://fgfsdb.stockill.org/ I'm just not sure if Curt will include objects from the FG scenery db into the default scenery area. Curt

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery DB

2005-11-05 Thread Martin Spott
Erik Hofman wrote: I would like to see all new scenery object contributions to end up in the scenery database. However, the last time I wanted to sync the base package and the DB there were more than one objects in the same space because of automatic object generation. Ooops, I've simply