Re: [Flightgear-devel] the new telnet server and scripting

2002-05-17 Thread Bernie Bright
Curtis L. Olson wrote: First, let me point out the new telnet server is *very* nice. Bernie has rewritten it based on the plib net libs. It can handle multiple concurrent connections. This is a big improvement! I'm not sure why you would need to run two or more sessions but there you go.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] the new telnet server and scripting

2002-05-17 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Bernie Bright writes: Curtis L. Olson wrote: First, let me point out the new telnet server is *very* nice. Bernie has rewritten it based on the plib net libs. It can handle multiple concurrent connections. This is a big improvement! I'm not sure why you would need to run two or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] the new telnet server and scripting

2002-05-17 Thread Bernie Bright
Curtis L. Olson wrote: [snip] Bernie, on the subjects of building additional commands into the telnet interface, I agree with Melchior. I'd rather not see the telnet interface being crammed with a bunch of extra commands that only the telnet interface knows about. I haven't looked at

[Flightgear-devel] the new telnet server

2002-05-16 Thread Melchior FRANZ
The new telnet server has really become nice. It's great to be able to connect more than just once. :-) But I don't like the new commands: view set n display view 'n' view get return current view index view current return current view index Why bloat the interface

Re: [Flightgear-devel] the new telnet server and scripting

2002-05-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
First, let me point out the new telnet server is *very* nice. Bernie has rewritten it based on the plib net libs. It can handle multiple concurrent connections. This is a big improvement! Along with this, Bernie has also provided a demo python script that shows how you can use the telnet