On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 01:57:09 -0500 Jonathan Polley wrote
When you state your concerns about the FAA, I assume that you are talking
about avionics software, probably DO-178B level C or higher.
FlightGear is a combination of an aircraft FDM, a GIS database and a 3D GUI.
When placed into an
On Tue, 28 May 2002 09:06:35 -0700 (PDT),
Alex Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 01:57:09 -0500 Jonathan Polley wrote
When you state your concerns about the FAA, I assume that you are
talking about avionics software, probably DO-178B level
On Monday, May 27, 2002, at 04:43 PM, joe mangan wrote:
Standards for application to general aviation aircraft have been revised as to reduce the burden for
certification of specific classes of avionics equipment.
AC 29-1309
An alternative would be to consider an effort to certify
Jonathan Polley writes:
The biggest problem I see with C++ and the FAA is that it is VERY hard to
guarantee that C++ will not do any dynamic memory allocation.
Agreed -- this is the 'crux' of the issue for long running 'critical'
software.
AFAIK most of this kind of software when written in
Norman Vine wrote:
Jonathan Polley writes:
The biggest problem I see with C++ and the FAA is that it is VERY hard
to
guarantee that C++ will not do any dynamic memory allocation.
Agreed -- this is the 'crux' of the issue for long running 'critical'
software.
AFAIK most of this kind of
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 07:59 AM, Jon Berndt wrote:
Norman Vine wrote:
Jonathan Polley writes:
The biggest problem I see with C++ and the FAA is that it is VERY hard
to
guarantee that C++ will not do any dynamic memory allocation.
Agreed -- this is the 'crux' of the issue for
Arnt Karlsen writes:
..can C code be generated from C++ or Java source without undue
difficulty using some tool? How about C++ from Java source?
Originally, back in the old days, C++ was implimented via a translater
that produced C code for final compilation. So, yes C code can be
generated,
