-Original Message-
From: Mally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 February 2004 7:12 pm
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] XML SCripting
You may not be a patent lawyer, but that's a convincing
sounding explanation
of
the legal position
Richard Bytheway wrote:
There was a comment on the /. discussion on this subject that the examiners have a quota of patents applications to process each week, so there is little incentive to dig too deep. I hope this is not the case, but it might be.
Ok. But since the patent request was filed
-devel] XML SCripting)
-Original Message-
From: Mally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 February 2004 7:12 pm
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] XML SCripting
You may not be a patent lawyer, but that's a convincing
sounding explanation
Mally wrote:
You may not be a patent lawyer, but that's a convincing sounding explanation
of
the legal position.
PS. I'm just wondering if you have any thoughts on my earlier question, i.e.
whether what's being patented has to be something non-obvious?
I didn't notice anything not obvious.
They
Tony Peden wrote:
PS. I'm just wondering if you have any thoughts on my earlier question, i.e.
whether what's being patented has to be something non-obvious?
Amazon: One-click ordering.
I think the answer is no.
Even if it's something that has to be non-obvious, that only means you have
to
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Tony Peden wrote:
PS. I'm just wondering if you have any thoughts on my earlier question, i.e.
whether what's being patented has to be something non-obvious?
Amazon: One-click ordering.
I think the answer is no.
Even if it's something that has to be
Can someone file a formal complain to this Microsoft patent:
This may be a good starter page for anyone wanting to file a protest:
http://www.uspto.gov/main/faq/p340030.htm
Mally
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version:
, February 13, 2004 5:16 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] XML SCripting
Can someone file a formal complain to this Microsoft patent:
This may be a good starter page for anyone wanting to file a protest:
http://www.uspto.gov/main/faq/p340030.htm
Mally
Presumably it can be traced back via CVS?
Mally
- Original Message -
From: Jon Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] XML SCripting
Holy ... !
JSBSim has been doing
-devel] XML SCripting
Can someone file a formal complain to this Microsoft patent:
This may be a good starter page for anyone wanting to file a protest:
http://www.uspto.gov/main/faq/p340030.htm
Mally
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http
that this is
patentable is absurd.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mally
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 5:16 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] XML SCripting
Can someone file a formal complain
Josh
Ummm, maybe I should have checked /. before posting that, they ran the
story last night.
Unsend Unsend Unsend!
No problem, except that you didn't quote the actual post you were trying to
unsend (Perhaps someone could try posting the story to Slashdot), which was a
bit confusing.
However
Richard
You may not be a patent lawyer, but that's a convincing sounding explanation of
the legal position.
Thanks.
Mally
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.581 / Virus Database: 368 - Release Date: 10/02/04
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Berndt) [2004.02.13 07:27]:
JSBSim has been doing this for some time, now. I can't remember just how
long, We include XML scripts from other scripts. The claim that this is
patentable is absurd.
Jon
Presumably it can be traced back via CVS?
Mally
This is
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:15:19 -0600
Cameron Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, Microsoft filed their patent on Dec. 1, 2000. The CVS entry
you reference was from Apr. 6, 2001. Can you beat the December date?
--
Cameron Moore
Probably.
Jon
___
You may not be a patent lawyer, but that's a convincing sounding explanation
of
the legal position.
PS. I'm just wondering if you have any thoughts on my earlier question, i.e.
whether what's being patented has to be something non-obvious?
Mally
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
16 matches
Mail list logo
