James Turner writes:
> - I uncovered some API inconsistencies between the fixlist and the
> navlist (some routines taking degrees, others radians, for lat / lon) :
> which do we prefer? (I'll fix the offenders)
In general, we prefer degrees on the user side and radians on the
math/physics si
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Just out of curiositty, does EHAM already contain the 6th runway?
It's not finished yet, but they were testing the ILS last week. I heard
some misgivings about actually having to land on a runway before getting
certification for the ILS ;-)
Cheers,
James Turner wrote:
Okay, so I have FG working with the DAFIFT NAV and WPT data (replaces
default.fix and default.nav). Now, I need some advice:
Just out of curiositty, does EHAM already contain the 6th runway?
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
James Turner wrote:
- I'm getting a bunch of odd records from the DAFIFT NAV file: they have
no frequency defined (which renders them rather useless except as
waypoints). They appear on my SimCharts from Jeppesen, along with
frequencies. Examples:
In the netherlands:
TWN
SSB
At leas
James Turner wrote:
- I'm getting a bunch of odd records from the DAFIFT NAV file: they have
no frequency defined (which renders them rather useless except as
waypoints). They appear on my SimCharts from Jeppesen, along with
frequencies. Examples:
In the netherlands:
TWN
SSB
Those a
> In the UK:
> SAT
> ODH
> At least the UK ones all have the 'TAC' prefix on my SimCharts. So
> does anyone know what these things are? I'm guessing it's something
> military related. The have frequencies in the VOR range (eg 117.7 Mhz
> based on SimCharts). Now, I can happily ignore them,
