Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread dene maxwell
From: Torsten Dreyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:58:31 +0200 If this is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] HUD

2006-06-21 Thread Erik Hofman
Olaf Flebbe wrote: Hi, The comment for fast_log is IMHO incorrect. /** * This function is about 3 times faster than the system log() function * and has an error of about 0.01% */ The relative error can be larger than 7% it is almost nowhere about 0.01% when used in the range [ 0.5 -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My OpenGL install identified as problematic

2006-06-21 Thread Erik Hofman
Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..just a WAG: I remember seing some Gloklaw discussion on Microsoft policy on dropping OpenGL for Longhorn alias Vista alias etc, could this be happening now ? Yes and no. Microsoft agreed to add a direct rendering API for OpenGL driver implementors (or opened it up or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] HUD

2006-06-21 Thread Christian Mayer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erik Hofman schrieb: Olaf Flebbe wrote: Hi, The comment for fast_log is IMHO incorrect. /** * This function is about 3 times faster than the system log() function * and has an error of about 0.01% */ The relative error can be larger than 7%

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My OpenGL install identified as problematic

2006-06-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:02:20 +0200, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..just a WAG: I remember seing some Gloklaw discussion on Microsoft policy on dropping OpenGL for Longhorn alias Vista alias etc, could this be happening now ? Yes and no. Microsoft

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My OpenGL install identified as problematic

2006-06-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:23:04 +0200, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..hmm. Nvidea. So here we and Nvidea needs to trust Microsoft. Didn't we (they) always? ;-) .. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread Lee Elliott
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 08:35, dene maxwell wrote: From: Torsten Dreyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Memory

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Problem with Sukhoi 26 panel

2006-06-21 Thread flying.toaster
Understood the problem ... Panels have their coordinates with a bottom left origin whereas instruments have a center origin ... My mistake Sorry for the inconvenience ... All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Lee Elliott wrote: Hi all, I think I may have a lead on this now, and it turns out that there was a connection with the 2D radio stacks but probably not one that many would suspect. First of all I commented out all the instruments on both the vfr and mini panels to see if just

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread dene maxwell
From: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:54:54 +0200 * Lee Elliott -- Wednesday 21 June

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2D Panel memory leak

2006-06-21 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* dene maxwell -- Wednesday 21 June 2006 22:55: I answered a previous post before before reading yours could this problem have existed for a while (previous versions)? No. It was a kind of copypaste error that I committed recently, with this log message: revision 1.47 date: 2006-06-05

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Getting closer: My Video Card Suspected

2006-06-21 Thread Jon S. Berndt
Jon Your 6800 and the NVIDIA drivers are probably fine or else the net would be abuzz about it being a bad card I reinstalled my previous card shortly ago, an Inno3D GeForce2 MX400. Once again, I had OpenGL capability. It worked fine. I reinstalled the new card, the eVGA GeForce 6800. I