Stuart Buchanan wrote
>
> --- On Wed, 23/7/08, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > 3d clouds have not been ported to osg. At the current rate
> > of progress - sometime in the next decade :-).
>
> Progress is marginally better than that - I've ported the code and have
> even got it to compile.
>
> I'm now
Hello Stuart,
BTW
as 3d clouds seems used multipass rendering maybe
http://projects.tevs.eu/osgppu will be of some help.
Regards
Sergey
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Stuart Buchanan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Wed, 23/7/08, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>> 3d clouds have not been ported to os
--- On Wed, 23/7/08, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> 3d clouds have not been ported to osg. At the current rate
> of progress - sometime in the next decade :-).
Progress is marginally better than that - I've ported the code and have even
got it to compile.
I'm now at the stage of crashes-on-startup whic
Tim Moore wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Sent: 24 July 2008 19:37
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Legacy #ifdefs
>
> James Turner wrote:
> > On 25 Jul 2008, at 01:07, Er
On 24 Jul 2008, at 20:36, Tim Moore wrote:
> I'm all for cleaning up the #ifdefs and #defines. As a baseline, we
> don't need
> to support compilers that are too broken to compile OpenSceneGraph,
> and we would
> like to support Cygwin. I believe that gives an oldest gcc version
> of 3.4.4.
James Turner wrote:
> Patch to remove macintosh and MWERKS from Simgear.
>
> Tested on Mac only - I'd verify Linux compilation normally but
> currently travelling.
Tested for Linux and committed.
>
> Note, screen/colours.h contains some code relating to gamma which
> looks very, very unlikely
Tim Moore wrote:
Hi Tim,
> IRIX (and Solaris and HP) compilers are still used by some of our
> developers,
> and they have their own set of special bugs.
Well, if you would consider having a closer look, I'd be happy to
create some Solaris/SunStudio error messages for you.
Last time people -
James Turner wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2008, at 01:07, Erik Hofman wrote:
>
>> I've just recently committed a patched version of JSBSim that did just
>> that and so far I've seen nobody complaining.
>> For me it's a rather simple issue; FlightGear 1.0 is the last version
>> for old(ish) hardware and comp
On 24 Jul 2008, at 19:43, James Turner wrote:
I'll work on some patches for the macintosh | __MWERKS__ | __APPLE__
stuff, FX / XMESA stuff is not controversial, but I'd want to avoid
creating merges headaches for people working on OSG code. I guess
cleaning up / getting rid of compilers.h will
Hello Martin,
Martin Fenelon wrote:
> Is the current official FlightGear scenery created with a 'World Custom
> Scenery Project' patched version of terragear?
yes, it is, which is also the reason for some very unfortunate bugs in
the scenery itself, which up to now I wasn't able to fix or work a
Martin Fenelon wrote:
> Is the current official FlightGear scenery created with a 'World Custom
> Scenery Project' patched version of terragear?
Well, this is not just a patched version, "TerraGear CS" (Custom
Scenery, see my previous EMail) is actually where TerraGear development
is being conti
Martin Fenelon wrote:
> Finally got an old terragear install running again, visual markings are
> exactly what I'm after. Talking of terragear, has the main site been
> moved? I can't get any of the documentation or older CVS snapshots.
You're going to find the most recent development of Terr
Hello,
Is the current official FlightGear scenery created with a 'World Custom
Scenery Project' patched version of terragear?
Martin.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the
On Sunday 20 July 2008 12:56, Curtis Olson wrote:
> > Sandtoft is a minor aerodrome and as such only has basic markings.
> > Non-precision has the 'piano keys' which aren't required in this
> > case. There is a splash screen as flightgear fires up featuring a
> > Cub. The runway markings in that im
On 25 Jul 2008, at 01:07, Erik Hofman wrote:
> I've just recently committed a patched version of JSBSim that did just
> that and so far I've seen nobody complaining.
> For me it's a rather simple issue; FlightGear 1.0 is the last version
> for old(ish) hardware and compilers and FlightGear CVS is
James Turner wrote:
> The key question is, are all of the above #defines safe to be killed?
> And are there any others I've missed? There's occasional references to
> Borland and IRIX compilers (i.e ancient versions of gcc, like pre
> 3.x!) in some #defines which I guess could also be cleaned
(Trying to get back up to speed with FG after a few years absence)
I've noticed the FG (and SG) code contain a fair amount of legacy pre-
processor cruft, some of which is already accompanied by (sometimes
hilarious) comments questioning its validity.
Notably:
- #defines relating to 3D
17 matches
Mail list logo
