Re: [Flightgear-devel] YASim Prop wash and the p51d

2009-07-05 Thread Detlef Faber
Am Montag, den 22.06.2009, 11:16 -0400 schrieb Jim Wilson: > Hi Andy, > > Looking through the code I don't see anything that considers prop > wash. That's still true correct? > > Assuming it is, I came across an old posting at > http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-de...@flightgear.org/msg074

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP notes on breaking compatibility with previous versions of aircrafts....

2009-07-05 Thread Rob Shearman, Jr.
Nic, It's also worth pointing out (again!) that users of CVS must accept that FG and its associated models are constant works-in-progress. Issues like you describe are easily fixable prior to an official release, but are difficult to manage in the constant state of flux between them. I'm in a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP notes on breaking compatibility with previous versions of aircrafts....

2009-07-05 Thread Nicolas Quijano
Sorry, I was going to send you the changes right after posting, should have done it the other way around. But your commits made it all moot, so I removed the archive attachment in my forum post. Thanks for doing something about it with that much speed, Cheers, Nic On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:37 PM, s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP notes on breaking compatibility with previous versions of aircrafts....

2009-07-05 Thread syd adams
I'll fix the dhc-6 , but have to go back through cvs file to remember what the original names were . Im not crazy about people putting different verions of my aircraft on the forum as it kind of makes my work pointless , but it's bound to happen. I think I prefer to do it in the aircraft model fold

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP notes on breaking compatibility with previous

2009-07-05 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Quijano wrote: > The specific "culprits" today are Syd Adams (dhc2, for sure and dhc6 also, I > think) and Gerard Robin (PBY-Catalina). There might have been more cases > today, and I think we have a few more a/c in cvs who exhibit those symptoms [...] > Or, if the aircraft no

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP notes on breaking compatibility with previous versions of aircrafts....

2009-07-05 Thread Nicolas Quijano
Thanks a lot for adding the model files to CVS, I was just done posting my own version of them on the forums :) I meant nothing by culprits, in case that wasn't clear, just as an example of what his us today : I'm a fan of your work on the Beaver and Twin Otter. I had completely forgotten about the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] property system extensions redux

2009-07-05 Thread Tim Moore
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: > Hi Tim, > > On Thursday 25 June 2009 23:58:42 Tim Moore wrote: >> Mathias Fröhlich wrote: >>> Hi Tim, > >> Seriously, I didn't realize that reducing dependencies on OSG in simgear is >> a design goal. That's fine, but I would really prefer to not think about >> whether

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MP notes on breaking compatibility with previous versions of aircrafts....

2009-07-05 Thread syd adams
Yes , I'm one of the culprits , and it's not a lack of foresight ,I've done it for a reason. MP is not my biggest concern , I did these aircraft for my own purposes , not entirely with gamers in mind ... but Im glad some like them all the same. These aircraft use one fuselage model now , with gear

[Flightgear-devel] MP notes on breaking compatibility with previous versions of aircrafts....

2009-07-05 Thread Nicolas Quijano
Hi all, there was a fly-in today in New Zealand, and even though a lot of us flew the same plane from the same author, we could only see each other as gliders. Why ? Because in the past couple months, some aircraft used today have undergone model file name changes as well as set file name changes,