On 11/05/2009 09:13 AM, Tim Moore wrote:
I'm not sure
that this attitude is always that of the user's own aircraft.
Point taken. The thing I first called the 12:00
view -- which is sometimes equivalent to the aircraft
attitude -- is not always equal to the attitude,
certainly not in look-at
On 11/05/2009 11:19 AM, Curtis Olson wrote in part:
Going way overboard with an
over-the-top authoritative style may actually take away from any good points
you are trying to make ...
Point taken.
By way of pathetic non-excuse, let me remark that a few
years ago I was rather
* John Denker -- Thursday 05 November 2009:
By way of pathetic non-excuse, let me remark that a few
years ago I was rather authoritatively flamed for daring
to put comments in FGFS code.
That's rather misleading. In fact you were criticized for:
- putting whole gdb stack traces(!) before
But be that as it may, let's continue push this discussion back towards a
positive productive direction since it is all too easy to become
unproductive. Ultimately we are trying to help Erik get the 3d sound
straightened out...
Curt.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
*
Curtis Olson wrote:
But be that as it may, let's continue push this discussion back towards
a positive productive direction since it is all too easy to become
unproductive. Ultimately we are trying to help Erik get the 3d sound
straightened out...
Which is luckily straightened out as far
Hi, All,
Alexis Bory has just provided us with an update to the FFG 7 model. It is so
good I thought it worth posting a short note. You can see it here:
ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/Maritime/FFG-7.png
This will form part of the USS Vinson Battle Group which we are in the
process of
Hi Martin, Vivian team
This is an honest question, trying to understand the direction where we can
evolve FG.
Currently the models in data/Models seem to serve two purposes, and I'm
wondering if they can be divided (kept in different repositories) based on
the purpose?
1) static objects
On 5 Nov 2009, at 23:22, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Alexis Bory has just provided us with an update to the FFG 7 model.
It is so
good I thought it worth posting a short note. You can see it here:
Nice work indeed!
--
On 11/05/2009 04:11 PM, Erik Hofman wrote:
But I do have a question I have updated the code in fgUpdateSunPos()
using quats and have it properly working at (0,0) lat and lon but not at
other places. I guess I need to multiply by yet another quat.. but which
one? Has anyone any clue?
There
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Tom P wrote:
Hi Martin, Vivian team
This is an honest question, trying to understand the direction where we can
evolve FG.
Currently the models in data/Models seem to serve two purposes, and I'm
wondering if they can be divided (kept in different
10 matches
Mail list logo
