I'm currently maintaining the 737-300, and it has this issue as well but
I
wonder if a fix might make the model worse.
Though it comes much closer to the Vr, it needs plenty of force on the
elevator
to rotate and lift off. And with that bug fixed I fear it will getting
worse
than now.
On 2/11/10 6:40 PM, Geoff McLane wrote:
Hi Curt, Melchior, Emmanuel, Syd, Detlef, Erik, or ...
As requested before, to HELP WIN32 users, could we PLEASE
have only ONE of EACH of the following PAIRS in FG data ;=()
From a WIN32 FG data update Feb 23, 2010,
and as noted in cvs logs...
I
Just to make available some more images if anyone wants to create splashes from
them, I found a few of these to have nice lighting effects with the setting sun.
http://s512.photobucket.com/albums/t325/barefootr/FlightGear%20Screen%20Shots/
Peter
On Feb 19, 2010, at 7:47 AM, John Denker wrote:
I dont like the gradient bar ... looks more like a thick layer of smog :)
Just out of curiosity , what's the white bar above the bottom Flightgear
?
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Reagan Thomas thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
HB-GRAL wrote:
I am just playing around a bit with this Allerta.
Geoff McLane wrote:
snip
As stated before, since WIN32 is NOT case sensitive
to file names, this causes CVS to always print a message of the form -
cvs update: move away file-name; it is in the way
and only ONE file is downloaded - probably not always the 'right' one ;=((.
snip
Ah, I'd
On 02/15/2010 03:19 AM, Tim Moore in part wrote:
readline() is pretty gross;
The best way to remove the grossness is to extirpate
readline and replace it with something that has a
nicer interface ... such as returning a std::string.
I wrote a getline function to do this. Much cleaner.
No
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:36 PM, John Denker j...@av8n.com wrote:
I tried asking for suggestions and/or review off-list,
but it appears that mail to timoor...@gmail.com never
goes through. Is it a list-mail address only?
No. Sometimes I'm busier and/or lamer than other times. I did get
Geoff McLane wrote:
So 62.5% done! Just three (3) to go :-))
1: [a380.rgb] vs [A380.rgb] in [A380/Models]
2: [COWLING.rgb] vs [COWLING.RGB] in [A380/Textures/Livery/House]
3: [ENDPLATE.rgb] vs [ENDPLATE.RGB] in [A380/Textures/Livery/House]
I wonder who's been adding/maintaining the A380.
Peter Brown wrote:
Just to make available some more images if anyone wants to create
splashes from them, I found a few of these to have nice lighting
effects with the setting sun.
http://s512.photobucket.com/albums/t325/barefootr/FlightGear%20Screen%20Shots/
Is this really one of
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 22:51 +, Martin Spott wrote:
Geoff McLane wrote:
So 62.5% done! Just three (3) to go :-))
1: [a380.rgb] vs [A380.rgb] in [A380/Models]
2: [COWLING.rgb] vs [COWLING.RGB] in [A380/Textures/Livery/House]
3: [ENDPLATE.rgb] vs [ENDPLATE.RGB] in
It's the Fouga Magister, from GRTux's site.
It is not included in the base package, but like Dave Culp's and Gary Neely's
aircraft, IMHO ...some of the best models designed for FlightGear and used by
many in FlightGear... are not included in the base package. While some may
disagree with me
I believe it makes the most sense for the featured aircraft to be both
commonly recognizable and present in the Flightgear repository. It
might confuse some people if they go looking for the featured aircraft
and didn't find it in the official downloads page. The Concorde and
the 747 make fine
I'm wondering what is the significance of the curious white or yellow
parallelogram seen near the Flightgear lettering in some of the most
recent batch of suggested images? This may be what Syd was asking
about as well.
-Gary
Yes , I wondered if I had missed a logo change , or if this was
13 matches
Mail list logo
