Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 for Mac OS X.

2012-02-18 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi, I made a special package for OS X 10.5. Go get the package from: http://macflightgear.sf.net/home/downloads FlightGear-2.6.0 for Leopard is what you need. I recommend this package for those who have OS X 10.5 or have problems running the 2.6.0 original package on 10.6 or 10.7. This is tested

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 13

2012-02-18 Thread BARANGER Emmanuel
Le 19/02/2012 00:55, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a écrit : > Send Flightgear-devel mailing list submissions to > flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> Demo: http://inmensia.com/files/hangar/flight-gallery/index.html > Firefox 3.6.26 doesn't show anything either, jus

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 for Mac OS X.

2012-02-18 Thread Curtis Olson
Sounds good -- I'm just asking questions. :-) Any thoughts on the reports of crashes for some Mac users -- are you thinking you might try to upload an update in the short term, or are these issues still pretty unknown? Again, just asking questions since I don't know much about the Mac side of thi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 for Mac OS X.

2012-02-18 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Curt, There's a big hope of 10.5 support. It's just a matter of time to me (to make some fixes and it's almost done). So we can encourage people to be patient for a while. I don't want to let users upgrade their Macs since there must be some reason not to upgrade. Tat On Feb 19, 2012, at 7:02

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 for Mac OS X.

2012-02-18 Thread Curtis Olson
Hi Tat, Is there any hope of supporting OSX 10.5 or do we just need to encourage people to upgrade their software? On my iMac I think it was free -- but I'm not much of a Mac expert -- is it fair to just encourage people to upgrade to OSX 10.6 or newer? Curt. On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:10 PM, T

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 for Mac OS X.

2012-02-18 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi, FlightGear 2.6.0 for Mac OS X is available (works on OS X 10.6, and 10.7 for now). Please download it from: https://sourceforge.net/projects/macflightgear/files/FlightGear/2.6.0/ Note: Currently our website is down so please download it from SF project page. Tat --- Tatsuhiro Nishioka ht

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue 8

2012-02-18 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:09:57 +0100, BARANGER wrote in message <4f3b6855.1000...@free.fr>: > Le 15/02/2012 00:58, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a > écrit : > > Hey Ant, ..me, I try to be wiser than those 6 legged critters. ;o) > You cite in your response the write of Clement,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Sanitizing materials.xml

2012-02-18 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:37:16 +, Stuart wrote in message : > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Emilian Huminiuc wrote: > > > 3. For urban/town areas I would do the same with water-tower.ac > > (for the same reasons as #2). > This is probably a bug from me not keeping materials-dds.xml and >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] (no subject)

2012-02-18 Thread Torsten Dreyer
Am 18.02.2012 10:55, schrieb Heiko Schulz: > I have created now a merge Request including the ratings of aircraft I>>>have been involved, I hope it is not too late. >>> >>> It is :-( >>> > >> Of course, it's never too late to be included in the master branch, >> which means that it will

[Flightgear-devel] (no subject)

2012-02-18 Thread Heiko Schulz
>>> I have created now a merge Request including the ratings of aircraft I >>> >>>have been involved, I hope it is not too late. >> >> It is :-( >> > Of course, it's never too late to be included in the master branch, > which means that it will be part of 2.8.0 coming out in 6 months from > no

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft ratings on the download page (was Re: Fair practice & autorisations)

2012-02-18 Thread Durk Talsma
On 18 Feb 2012, at 07:15, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > Am 18.02.2012 01:04, schrieb Heiko Schulz: >> I have created now a merge Request including the ratings of aircraft I have >> been involved, I hope it is not too late. > > It is :-( > Of course, it's never too late to be included in the master