[Flightgear-devel] Howto modify release branch?

2013-02-06 Thread Renk Thorsten
Could anyone perhaps instruct me how to push onto the release branch? I have committed a couple of shader bugfixes to the master branch which should go to release as well, but I don't have a local release branch by default, so I'm unsure what to do. Or is the idea that only a subset of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Howto modify release branch?

2013-02-06 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Renk Thorsten wrote: Could anyone perhaps instruct me how to push onto the release branch? I have committed a couple of shader bugfixes to the master branch which should go to release as well, but I don't have a local release branch by default, so I'm unsure what to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Synchronizing nav.dat ?

2013-02-06 Thread James Turner
On 6 Feb 2013, at 02:15, ys flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote: I guess many parts of nav.dat updates are related to updates in apt.dat (i.e. ILS, VOR-DME freqs etc.). For me personally it only makes sense to update to current navaids when apt.dat can be updated too, otherwise I guess the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] SimGear branch, next, updated. fd8369142a291a473e8d1587ad0d7fcc252b6ad5

2013-02-06 Thread James Turner
On 6 Feb 2013, at 22:04, Flightgear-commitlogs mar...@hypersphere.calit2.net wrote: Building performance improvements. Use sensible LoD range of 10km and gradual fade-out to 20km rather than fixed 20km+ LoD range. Also make deeper quad-tree to make culling easier. Is this a

[Flightgear-devel] Point release experiment

2013-02-06 Thread James Turner
(Following on from my previous email about Stuart's random-buildings commit) Many people have observed that FlightGear hits maximum quality in the weeks immediately following a release, since we have the maximum amount of feedback and testing from users. (And since most people don't look at RC

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] SimGear branch, next, updated. fd8369142a291a473e8d1587ad0d7fcc252b6ad5

2013-02-06 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:05 PM, James Turner wrote: Is this a significant enough / safe enough change to push to the release branch? It should be safe enough, as it's just applying some techniques already used for the trees. I'm ambivalent about whether it's a release branch candidate

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Point release experiment

2013-02-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:12:25 +, James wrote in message fa73c35d-94c2-4730-9715-96efe2ae9...@mac.com: (Following on from my previous email about Stuart's random-buildings commit) Many people have observed that FlightGear hits maximum quality in the weeks immediately following a release,

[Flightgear-devel] Gravity

2013-02-06 Thread Wil Neeley
is gravity handled by the gravity.cxx file or does the FDM override the .cxx Wil Neeley -- Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free!