On Thursday 23 November 2006 20:47, Durk Talsma wrote:
The most proper solution in this case is probably to remove the conditional
if (current != i) (Since it cannot be false anyways). I'll give it a test,
and if it works satisfactory I'll check it in.
Thanks for the explanation Fred.
Okay,
Hi Maik,
It looks like I completely overlooked your message yesterday. I've been
playing with your idea a bit. Some more comments below.
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 19:53, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi,
I built a version with debug info only for this file and got, as
expected, normal performance.
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 20:52, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
Anyone else observing these crashes?
Yep.
Olaf
Okay, I've committed my proposed fix to CVS Head. Please check.
Cheers,
Durk
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence
3 matches
Mail list logo