I realize this is not a satisfactory response for some people, but I have
added "downloadmanagerapp.com" to the list of blocked sites.
Thanks,
Curt.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Anders Gidenstam
wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
>
> > Curt, are you there? Repeating the links
Anders Gidenstam wrote :
> If it is not possible to be more restrictive on what ads to show (and
> even if that can be done I'm sure the guys paying for these sort of ads
> would do their best to by-pass any such restriction) then IMO the ads
> should go. Maybe the text ads could stay but the
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
> Curt, are you there? Repeating the links in case you missed them:
>
> http://www.flightsim.com/vbfs/content.php?13546-FlightGear-v2-10-Is-Released#comments
> http://www.flightsim.com/vbfs/showthread.php?260718-FlightGear-2-10-is-now-available-!&p=1747315#p
Curt, are you there? Repeating the links in case you missed them:
http://www.flightsim.com/vbfs/content.php?13546-FlightGear-v2-10-Is-Released#comments
http://www.flightsim.com/vbfs/showthread.php?260718-FlightGear-2-10-is-now-available-!&p=1747315#post1747315
Thanks!
Gijs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/2013 03:50 PM, Olivier wrote:
> Hi Gijs,
>
>
>
>
>
*De :* Gijs de Rooy
> *Envoyé le :* Samedi 23 février 2013 11h13 **
>> I won't ask for the adds to be removed (appar
Hi Gijs,
De : Gijs de Rooy
Envoyé le : Samedi 23 février 2013 11h13
> I won't ask for the adds to be removed (apparently that is not possible), but
> I do want to bring the result of that decision under
> your attention. Is this really what we want?
Using A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry for empty message. Here it is. :)
Here is now an alternative tracker (I also track my FGFS-related
torrents to the original + in addition to my tracker) for all
BitTorrent download:
http://flightgear.mxchange.org:23456/
Just click on the links
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/2013 11:26 AM, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi Gijs, et al.,
>
> Slowly coming back to FlightGear land, now that my deadline is met.
> :-)
>
> Yes, I think that this is undesirable. Having adds inside the
> content area of a website is usually consi
Hi Gijs, et al.,
Slowly coming back to FlightGear land, now that my deadline is met. :-)
Yes, I think that this is undesirable. Having adds inside the content area of a
website is usually considered to be poor design, from a usability perspective.
I don't mind if we have some adds on the top, o
On 02/23/2013 11:13 AM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I won't ask for the adds to be removed (apparently that is not
> possible), but I do want to bring the result of that decision under your
> attention. Is this really what we want?
One quick option would be to move the navigation bar below t
Hi all,
I won't ask for the adds to be removed (apparently that is not possible), but I
do want to bring the result of that decision under your attention. Is this
really what we want?
http://www.flightsim.com/vbfs/content.php?13546-FlightGear-v2-10-Is-Released#comments
http://www.flightsim.com/
11 matches
Mail list logo
