> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of AnMaster
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 11:48 AM
> Why couldn't Datcom be installed in the user's home directory
> like most programs? Or does datcom not support --prefix to
> ./configure? (N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bill Galbraith wrote:
> That is really great to hear. I wasn't sure if it was going to be compatible
> across Linux systems. The biggest problem that the Linux guys are going to
> have are probably having the password to the root account, and making
On Thursday 12 July 2007 14:56, Bill Galbraith wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Torsten Dreyer
> > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:52 AM
> > To: FlightGear developers discussion
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Torsten Dreyer
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:52 AM
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Datcom+ 2.1 Release annoucement
>
> Hi
Hi Bill,
thanks for this great improvement. I just downloaded the linux package and it
ran without problems over the provided examples on my OpenSuse 10.2 System.
Torsten
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Down
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pablo
Rogina
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:18 AM
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Datcom+ 2.1 Release annoucement
> 'helping', but he complained about stuf
'helping', but he complained about stuff that I just wasn't seeing. There
are some differences in the Windows XP installation ('Program Files'
becomes
'Programmes'). Turns out that his system was minorally hosed, and I
Have you tried some installation builder to create the installation packege
Dang, I really need to try this package out. I'm going to need to take a
couple of vacation days or something though. Getting hammered this entire
summer from all sides.
Made some progress with my UAV altitude hold controller this morning before
work. I have a plot and a movie of the flightgea
FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Datcom+ 2.1 Release annoucement
Dang, I really need to try this package out. I'm going to need to take a
couple of vacation days or something though. Getting hammered this entire
summer from all sides.
Made some progress with m
I am happy to annouce the release of of Datcom+ 2.1. This has been a LOT of
work packaging these tools into nice installation packages, for Windows XP
and Windows Vista for point and click people, Cygwin under Windows XP and
Vista for the smells-like-Linux group, and Linux (compiled under Debian).
> What are sensible mach/alt pairs to use? I am assuming that sea level
> and approach speed are one, and cruising speed and altitude are another.
> What else? Do I even need to define more than one?
>
> Josh
You might try looking in a textbook or in an aircraft technical report (see
the reports l
> What are sensible mach/alt pairs to use? I am assuming that sea level
> and approach speed are one, and cruising speed and altitude are another.
> What else? Do I even need to define more than one?
You should be fine with one alt/mach pair. I did not find any significant
differences in the coeff
Josh:
The "authority" on this DATCOM+ is Bill Galbraith. I'm not sure if he
subscribes to Flightgear-Devel. If you don't get a response here, post it to
JSBSim-devel. I'll let Bill know you are taking a look at this.
Jon
> OK, so I am taking a swing at the B-47 with DATCOM+. I have a few
> quest
OK, so I am taking a swing at the B-47 with DATCOM+. I have a few
questions about the input definitions:
What are sensible mach/alt pairs to use? I am assuming that sea level
and approach speed are one, and cruising speed and altitude are another.
What else? Do I even need to define more than one?
14 matches
Mail list logo
