Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: how to go on?

2008-02-02 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi there, > >> It would also open some further possibilities, such as text-to-speech >> or pre-recorded messages. >> Drawback is, we would lose the portaudio driver. I don't know if Tat >> used that or openal on Mac, and no idea if any windows users managed >> to get fgcom running at all. > > I ha

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: how to go on?

2008-02-01 Thread Holger Wirtz
Csaba, On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:34:46PM +0100, Csaba Hal?sz wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 8:48 AM, Holger Wirtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There is a nearly stable iaxc version 2 available which has some > > advantages (for VoIP, not necessarily for the usage with FG). The build > > system is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: how to go on?

2008-01-31 Thread Csaba Halász
On Jan 29, 2008 8:48 AM, Holger Wirtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is a nearly stable iaxc version 2 available which has some > advantages (for VoIP, not necessarily for the usage with FG). The build > system is now based on autotools which makes it complexer for me (I have > no idea about

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: how to go on?

2008-01-29 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi Holger, I think you should go for iaxc 2 for more realistic radio sound simulation, like Lo-Fi filter and noise reduction. If possible, Lo-Fi filter can be toggled with an option. If I were you, I would release the current version with iaxc 1after applying and testing the patches, and then wo

[Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: how to go on?

2008-01-28 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi *, I am thinking about the next steps for fgcom. Jesper sent a patch for openal support and Tat made a patch for MacOSX (commited in the morning). Both are based on iaxclient (or iaxc) version 1. There is a nearly stable iaxc version 2 available which has some advantages (for VoIP, not necessa