Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear prerelease; RPMs available + PATCH

2007/11/27, Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So it's only missing #include which should be in the code. See the attachments. [...] #include math.h +#include stdlib.h +#include cstring Surely that should be string.h, no? It's just a style thing, but if you're modifying code that is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear prerelease; RPMs available + PATCH

Hi. I have yet another two patches to get FlightGear and Simgear compiling with new gcc 4.3, which is stricter about missing declarations of functions. So it's only missing #include which should be in the code. See the attachments. Btw. I'm building the RPMs for Fedora, Mandriva and SuSE in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear prerelease; RPMs available + PATCH

On Tuesday 27 November 2007 15:22, Ladislav Michnovič wrote: Hi. I have yet another two patches to get FlightGear and Simgear compiling with new gcc 4.3, which is stricter about missing declarations of functions. So it's only missing #include which should be in the code. See the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear prerelease; RPMs available + PATCH

So it's only missing #include which should be in the code. See the attachments. [...] #include math.h +#include stdlib.h +#include cstring Surely that should be string.h, no? It's just a style thing, but if you're modifying code that is already using ANSI C headers, and not Standard C++