Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Re: Bug in JSBSim FGPropeller.cpp

2007-08-09 Thread Torsten Dreyer
I just tried FG rebuilt with that update, with P-38L when pushing the throttle and pulling and pushing the aircraft reaction is better the aircraft heading is now close to be stable. Same here with the Seneca. And debugging the moments shows that they are now symmetrical as

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Re: Bug in JSBSim FGPropeller.cpp

2007-08-08 Thread gh.robin
On Tue 7 August 2007 22:37, Berndt, Jon S wrote: Yes there is some differences needed to keep the right heading , when we modify the throttle value, but it is not exactly what you are describing. I haven't been able to look too closely at this, yet, but I have a suspicion. If you look in

[Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Re: Bug in JSBSim FGPropeller.cpp

2007-08-07 Thread gh.robin
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug in JSBSim FGPropeller.cpp Date: Tue 7 August 2007 21:03 From: gh.robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue 7 August 2007 20:00, Torsten Dreyer wrote:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Re: Bug in JSBSim FGPropeller.cpp

2007-08-07 Thread Berndt, Jon S
Yes there is some differences needed to keep the right heading , when we modify the throttle value, but it is not exactly what you are describing. I haven't been able to look too closely at this, yet, but I have a suspicion. If you look in the function FGPropeller::GetPowerRequired() there