On Fri 6 July 2007 01:41, John Denker wrote:
On 07/05/2007 06:57 PM, gh.robin wrote:
When i opened that topic , it was to know if we could hope any FG update
to get an altitude instrument which can be able to indicate more than
61000 ft.
We have had a lot of discussion on it , but
On Fri 6 July 2007 01:41, John Denker wrote:
On 07/05/2007 06:57 PM, gh.robin wrote:
When i opened that topic , it was to know if we could hope any FG update
to get an altitude instrument which can be able to indicate more than
61000 ft.
We have had a lot of discussion on it , but
On Mon 18 June 2007 10:06, Stefan Seifert wrote:
John Denker wrote:
If you want to know exactly why FGFS poops out at approximately
62,000 feet, look at line 88 of Environment/environment.cxx
You can contrast that with the ISA table that goes up to 278,000
feet as found e.g. at
On 07/05/2007 06:57 PM, gh.robin wrote:
When i opened that topic , it was to know if we could hope any FG update to
get an altitude instrument which can be able to indicate more than 61000 ft.
We have had a lot of discussion on it , but nothing which could give the right
answer.
Do we have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John Denker wrote:
If you want to know exactly why FGFS poops out at approximately
62,000 feet, look at line 88 of Environment/environment.cxx
You can contrast that with the ISA table that goes up to 278,000
feet as found e.g. at the
On 06/18/2007 04:06 AM, Stefan Seifert wrote:
If you want to know exactly why FGFS poops out at approximately
62,000 feet, look at line 88 of Environment/environment.cxx
Just for my understanding: this table is only used for instrumentation,
isn't it?
Both JSBSim and YASim have their own
On Mon 18 June 2007 10:06, Stefan Seifert wrote:
John Denker wrote:
If you want to know exactly why FGFS poops out at approximately
62,000 feet, look at line 88 of Environment/environment.cxx
You can contrast that with the ISA table that goes up to 278,000
feet as found e.g. at
John
Sent: 18 June 2007 10:41
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Instrument-altimeter unable
to indicate altitude above 61831 feet
On 06/18/2007 04:06 AM, Stefan Seifert wrote:
snip
4) By the way, did you ever wonder what osi means
John Denker wrote:
That's an interesting question.
So there's not a clean division between instrumentation and
other.
2) But wait, there's more. The FDM's model of the atmosphere
model is blissfully ignorant of the properties of the actual
air mass. If you change the local barometric
On 06/16/2007 09:12 PM, gh.robin wrote:
I notice a some strange behaviours with the Instrument Altimeter
The Instrument Altimeter is unable to indicate more than 61831 feet
Here the snapshot of property:
instrument/altimeter/indicated-altitude-ft== 61831
position/altitude-ft
Hello,
I notice a some strange behaviours with the Instrument Altimeter
The Instrument Altimeter is unable to indicate more than 61831 feet
Here the snapshot of property:
instrument/altimeter/indicated-altitude-ft== 61831
position/altitude-ft == 75793
11 matches
Mail list logo
