I don't see ESP as changing much. It might have appeal from some quarters,
but there will still be those who want open source solutions.
Jon
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Nove
I see nothing in the microsoft esp announcement about patents.
It is simply Microsoft saying "we have a 3d world already done(from
microsoft flight simulator) and if you want to write a simulation that
uses it then we will license it to you"
It seems microsoft is really emphasizing the amount of
On 28/11/2007, Stuart Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given this, we don't need to worry any more about MS patents than we did
> before the announcement, i.e. hardly at all. All the I/O stuff they've
> announced
> is already present in FG.
Software patents have no force in Canada in any ca
LeeE wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 November 2007 12:40, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> > This is very interesting:
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/esp/
> > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2216455,00.asp
> >
> > Jon
>
> This _is_ interesting.
>
> FlightGear (and SimGear), as it (they) are, should be ok r
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 12:40, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> This is very interesting:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/esp/
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2216455,00.asp
>
> Jon
This _is_ interesting.
FlightGear (and SimGear), as it (they) are, should be ok re patents
because it (they) pre-d
This is very interesting:
http://www.microsoft.com/esp/
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2216455,00.asp
Jon
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the
6 matches
Mail list logo
