> I do not demand an answer, but if someone has a document or something
I've just made a page and put the four parts of the two documents from
the freely available NASA/Boeing 747 report there. It's at
http://www.zaretto.com/simdownloads.html
It is very similar to the documents that you still
> Yes, of course. I didn't say the way it's fixed is bad, or that it
> doesn't work. But as I never tried to code a FDM myself I really lack an
> understanding of the complexities, and so I ask. I'd say the question is
> the beginning of wisdom :)
>
> I do not demand an answer, but if someone has a
Richard Harrison wrote:
I 100% agree with the way Jon has fixed this. Suggesting that there is
simpler way of doing it indicates a lack of understanding of the
complexities.
Yes, of course. I didn't say the way it's fixed is bad, or that it
doesn't work. But as I never tried to code a FDM mys
What I don't understand about this issue: why even zero velocity? There
should never be zero velocity, since there is nearly always some wind,
It is a classic problem in flight simulation, and simplistically a lot
of the maths don't function very well at low/zero velocities. JSBSim
models thi
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
Note that I'm still not sure how this is going to work with carrier
landings. The zero velocity code may get bypassed, since a carrier is
normally not at zero speed. I can't remember if I accounted for that or not.
Probably an easy fix, anyhow.
What I don't understand ab
> Although my testing so far has been limited to a few quick
> flights in the PC7,
> I must comment on the huge improvement in gear behaviour at or near
> standstill - previously I've seen the pc7 flip right over at rest
> from gear
> jitter but it looks great now, thanks for working on that.
Than
On Friday 13 January 2006 13:11, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> As has been mentioned, the new JSBSim code has/is being moved over to
> FlightGear. It is JSBSim v0.9.10 code, using JSBSim config file
> specification v2.0.
Although my testing so far has been limited to a few quick flights in the PC7,
I mu
Jon S. Berndt wrote :
> The filtersjb/ directory is no longer needed. It should be eliminated.
>
done in CVS
-Fred
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJA
>
> Are these files no longer necessary? If not, do they belong in cvs or
> do I need to get them from elsewhere? Is this just a temporary effect
> of all the jsbsim changes (maybe all changes aren't in yet?)
>
> Thank you
>
> Ima
I think the directory and file structure in FlightGear might be in
As has been mentioned, the new JSBSim code has/is being moved over to
FlightGear. It is JSBSim v0.9.10 code, using JSBSim config file
specification v2.0.
Until I get time to write some proper release notes, please see the most
recent three or four JSBSim newsletters ("Back of the Envelope") on the
10 matches
Mail list logo
