Re: [Flightgear-devel] New nasal drop, new syntax

2008-09-27 Thread Vivian Meazza
Alex Perry wrote > Negative 8-). > When I recompiled SG and FG after pulling the update in, FGFS started > working. > Either there was something else that got fixed by this extra recompile > iteration, > or there is some architecture specific bug you happened to provide a fix > for. > How intere

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New nasal drop, new syntax

2008-09-26 Thread Alex Perry
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that a reasonably big Nasal change just went into SimGear. > As always, let me know what broke. Negative 8-). When I recompiled SG and FG after pulling the update in, FGFS started working. Either there was something else

[Flightgear-devel] New nasal drop, new syntax

2008-09-26 Thread Andy Ross
Note that a reasonably big Nasal change just went into SimGear. Melchior had a chance to test it out first, so hopefully not too much will have broken. The documentation for the new syntax is below. There's also been some work done to reduce the memory footprint for strings (store short strings in