Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-21 Thread ThorstenB
Quiet?? Who said quiet? :-) -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread Ryan M
> Now it seems to me it has changed. The list is quiet since a while now; there > are only few announcements for code changes, (in the past we had more, though > the number of changes are still similar), and as I can see more and more > people using the forum for questions about developement and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread Martin Spott
Heiko Schulz wrote: > If the weather is fine, yep, the real pilots here like Detlef, Syd > and others spent their time getting some more hours of flight, [...] or are busy with preparations for buying an aircraft - a Cessna 17*5*, in our case Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user frien

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, well, I have to explain: > > > It seems more and more that people prefer using the > forum instead the > > devel-list. > > vs. > > > Forum activity is winding down too- all the informal > aircraft/scenery > > developers have either left or are inactive. > > What a nice example of percepti

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread thorsten . i . renk
> It seems more and more that people prefer using the forum instead the > devel-list. vs. > Forum activity is winding down too- all the informal aircraft/scenery > developers have either left or are inactive. What a nice example of perceptional relativism! We have the same set of data (= the a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread Detlef Faber
Am Mittwoch, den 16.03.2011, 19:21 -0700 schrieb Ryan M: > > It seems more and more that people prefer using the forum instead the > devel-list. > > (Certainly not me!) > > Forum activity is winding down too- all the informal aircraft/scenery > developers have either left or are inactive. > > I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-16 Thread Ryan M
> It seems more and more that people prefer using the forum instead the devel-list. (Certainly not me!) Forum activity is winding down too- all the informal aircraft/scenery developers have either left or are inactive.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-15 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Roland Haeder wrote: > Sssshhh! One little thing: > > fgms/GIT sometimes drops a pilot who is flying on an other server. My > server mpserver08 is latest GIT and has only mserver01 configured as > "hub". > > Some days ago I played with someone (he as my wing man) who came from

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-15 Thread Roland Haeder
Sssshhh! One little thing: fgms/GIT sometimes drops a pilot who is flying on an other server. My server mpserver08 is latest GIT and has only mserver01 configured as "hub". Some days ago I played with someone (he as my wing man) who came from mpserver06. He somtimes disappeared in thin air but wa

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-15 Thread Heiko Schulz
> It's been quiet here. It seems more and more that people prefer using the forum instead the devel-list. -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-15 Thread Martin Spott
"Jon S. Berndt" wrote: > It's been quiet here. s/quiet/healthy/ Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- --

[Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-15 Thread Jon S. Berndt
It's been quiet here. -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d