Thank you Thomas ;)From the google map, for those of you who managed to see it, you can see with the larger zoom that either side of the canal the ground is green, that means that the canal still contains flowing water. However it is true that is width might not be larger than 2-4 m. I guess the si
Am Mittwoch 22 März 2006 18:55 schrieb Julien Pierru:
> well there is definitely a canal down there, not sure if it is dried up or
> not:
>
> http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=19.693701,-98.845561&spn=0.016544,0.021715&t
>=k&hl=en
>
> Julien
>
> P.S:that thred definitely generated some interests, thou
"Julien Pierru" wrote:
> http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=3D19.693701,-98.845561&spn=3D0.016544,0.0217=
> 15&t=3Dk&hl=3Den
In order to make this URL work you have to remove every occurrence of
"3D" and remove the "=" before the line break as well:
http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=19.693701,-98.84
well there is definitely a canal down there, not sure if it is dried up or not:http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=19.693701,-98.845561&spn=0.016544,0.021715&t=k&hl=en
JulienP.S:that thred definitely generated some interests, though not the one i was hoping for, lol...
Quoting Jon Stockill :
> Martin Spott wrote:
>
> > We should be happy that reality has always some surprise for us from
> > time to time :-)
>
> Someone complained about the pylons running along next to the bridge
> across the bay on approach to KSFO. It seemed odd to me too, but I
> checked anyw
Martin Spott wrote:
We should be happy that reality has always some surprise for us from
time to time :-)
Someone complained about the pylons running along next to the bridge
across the bay on approach to KSFO. It seemed odd to me too, but I
checked anyway and...
http://maps.google.com/?l
Well, the NASA pic is over thirty years old .. wasn't the canals drying up
what nailed the civilization in the first place ??
There seems to be a surfeit of water in many places, there are some
floating buildings
in Boston harbour, perhaps FG is looking ahead thirty years and trying to
tell
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>
>> Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
>>
>>
Hmm, according to this, there is a canal that carries the San Juan
river
there.
http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/images/teotihuacan.jpg
>>>
>>> Strange... maybe it was not w
Martin Spott wrote:
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
Hmm, according to this, there is a canal that carries the San Juan river
there.
http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/images/teotihuacan.jpg
Strange... maybe it was not with water when I was walking there? According
to the pictures, it
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
>> Hmm, according to this, there is a canal that carries the San Juan river
>> there.
>>
>> http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/images/teotihuacan.jpg
>
> Strange... maybe it was not with water when I was walking there? According
> to the pictures, it would be difficul
> Hmm, according to this, there is a canal that carries the San Juan river
> there.
>
> http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/images/teotihuacan.jpg
Strange... maybe it was not with water when I was walking there? According
to the pictures, it would be difficult to miss...
V
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
>
> I walked all around the place on foot (in real life, that is), and there are
> no rivers there...
Hmm, according to this, there is a canal that carries the San Juan river
there.
http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/images/teotihuacan.jpg
Josh
> Probably there even is a "river" in real life, but it doesn't have a
> default width of 50m. I have seen many "rivers" in the FG scenery that are
> 4-10m wide in real life.
>
I walked all around the place on foot (in real life, that is), and there are
no rivers there...
V
--
Am Mittwoch, 22. März 2006 14:07 schrieb Martin Spott:
> Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 07:40, Julien Pierru wrote:
> >> Teotihuacan pyramid complex:
> >> http://flamebunny.homelinux.net/pics/fgfs/Teotihuacan.jpg (20m NE of
> >> Mexico City MMMX on heading 045);
> >
> >
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 March 2006 07:40, Julien Pierru wrote:
>> Teotihuacan pyramid complex:
>> http://flamebunny.homelinux.net/pics/fgfs/Teotihuacan.jpg (20m NE of Mexico
>> City MMMX on heading 045);
> Nice, but we clearly see a nasty scenery bug there --- there is no riv
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 07:40, Julien Pierru wrote:
> Teotihuacan pyramid complex:
> http://flamebunny.homelinux.net/pics/fgfs/Teotihuacan.jpg (20m NE of Mexico
> City MMMX on heading 045);
Nice, but we clearly see a nasty scenery bug there --- there is no river there
in the real life...
V.
I just started working on this, I decided to model as much of the ancient buildings lying around the Earth.Here are the first few ones:Giza pyramids:
http://flamebunny.homelinux.net/pics/fgfs/Great_Pyramids.jpgTeotihuacan pyramid complex: http://flamebunny.homelinux.net/pics/fgfs/Teotihuacan.jpg
17 matches
Mail list logo