On Sun, 16 Oct 2011, ThorstenB wrote:
> Am 16.10.2011 23:30, schrieb Curtis Olson:
>
>> One question: if we have our own local branches of the fgdata repository
>> for our own experimentation, will it be straightforward to hang these
>> off the new repository?
>
> Simple answer: no. :-(
>
> Since
Am 16.10.2011 23:30, schrieb Curtis Olson:
> One question: if we have our own local branches of the fgdata repository
> for our own experimentation, will it be straightforward to hang these
> off the new repository?
Simple answer: no. :-(
Since we really want to reduce the repository size - that
e the next pull. The
medicine might be slightly bitter, but you will feel a lot better after it,
methinks.
Ciao (because I can),
Alessandro
From: curtol...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:30:11 -0500
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata is f
Hi Thorsten,
One question: if we have our own local branches of the fgdata repository for
our own experimentation, will it be straightforward to hang these off the
new repository?
Thanks,
Curt.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 2:31 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
> Jorg and Gijs are working on the new fgdata rep
Jorg and Gijs are working on the new fgdata repo now.
Therefore the existing fgdata repo is frozen as of now - even commit
privileges are removed - hopefully permanently for the (historic) fgdata
repo.
They'll start a new (temporary) repository. Once the new repo is all
setup and working as exp
5 matches
Mail list logo