* Syd -- Saturday 19 April 2008:
can you name an example so I can see what you mean ? My vote would
be to do something about it , so if mine are like this [...]
I haven't looked closely, but I didn't refer to your aircraft.
You get a good impression if you try this:
$ ls
On sam 19 avril 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
There are more and more aircraft in CVS with two *-set.xml
files, where one is basically empty and only referring to
a second one. This is understandable in cases where actually
more than one FDM is used or very likely to be used in the
next time.
There are more and more aircraft in CVS with two *-set.xml
files, where one is basically empty and only referring to
a second one. This is understandable in cases where actually
more than one FDM is used or very likely to be used in the
next time. But it's becoming a problem if this redundant
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
There are more and more aircraft in CVS with two *-set.xml
files, where one is basically empty and only referring to
a second one. This is understandable in cases where actually
more than one FDM is used or very likely to be used in the
next time. But it's becoming a
Melchior Franz wrote
Sent: 19 April 2008 07:57
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] foo-set.xml - foo-yasim-set.xml
There are more and more aircraft in CVS with two *-set.xml
files, where one is basically empty and only referring to a
second one
5 matches
Mail list logo
