-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
K. Hoercher wrote:
On 9/18/07, Csaba Halász [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for reporting this.
I think it would be better to explicitly check for runway type
instead of checking for not taxiway. Any comments?
Whatever you see fit.
I checked
Hi!
The changes to runways.cxx recently included to enable the groundradar
left the searching for runways (as far as I looked, at least needed
by atis and setting the active runway) broken. As it now would often
find a taxiway as closest to a given heading the callers become a
bit confused.
I
now really, I hope *g*
On 9/18/07, K. Hoercher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please find attached a small hack to fix this.
regards
K. Hoercher
notaxiway.patch
Description: Binary data
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
On 9/18/07, K. Hoercher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
The changes to runways.cxx recently included to enable the groundradar
left the searching for runways (as far as I looked, at least needed
by atis and setting the active runway) broken. As it now would often
find a taxiway as closest to a
4 matches
Mail list logo
