Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-25 Thread Durk Talsma
On Sunday 25 January 2009 21:16:43 Tim Moore wrote: > > Yes, it's important to type the whole thing, > git checkout -b maint origin/maint > > When you first check out the repository, "git checkout maint" should give > you an error, because the maint branch doesn't exist locally. "git-checkout > -b

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-25 Thread Tim Moore
Durk Talsma wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2009 17:50:04 Frederic Bouvier wrote: >>> Whoops. I've created a master branch in the repository, so you can >>> either redo >>> the clone, or you can type "git-checkout -b maint origin/maint" to >>> e.g. check out the maint branch directly. >> Both worked.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-25 Thread Durk Talsma
On Friday 16 January 2009 17:50:04 Frederic Bouvier wrote: > > Whoops. I've created a master branch in the repository, so you can > > either redo > > the clone, or you can type "git-checkout -b maint origin/maint" to > > e.g. check out the maint branch directly. > > Both worked. Thanks > > -Fred I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-16 Thread Frederic Bouvier
- "Tim Moore" a écrit : > Frederic Bouvier wrote: > > - "Tim Moore" a écrit : > > > >> Frederic Bouvier wrote: > >>> - "Tim Moore" a écrit : > >>> > Reminder: > > > >>> Initialized empty Git repository in > I:/Devel/fg-maint/simgear/.git/ > >>> Initialize simgear/.git > >>> warn

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-16 Thread Tim Moore
Frederic Bouvier wrote: > - "Tim Moore" a écrit : > >> Frederic Bouvier wrote: >>> - "Tim Moore" a écrit : >>> Reminder: > >>> Initialized empty Git repository in I:/Devel/fg-maint/simgear/.git/ >>> Initialize simgear/.git >>> warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-16 Thread Frederic Bouvier
- "Tim Moore" a écrit : > Frederic Bouvier wrote: > > - "Tim Moore" a écrit : > > > >> Reminder: > >> git-clone git://repo.or.cz/simgear.git > >> git-clone git://repo.or.cz/flightgear.git > > > > $ git-clone git://repo.or.cz/simgear.git > > remote: Counting objects: 9905, done. > > remote

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-16 Thread Tim Moore
Csaba Halász wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:56 AM, James Turner wrote: >> On 14 Jan 2009, at 23:40, Csaba Halász wrote: >> >>> There are some pending NaN problems I have reported, but have not >>> been fixed. >>> And users are complaining about IntersectionVisitor/CullVisitor >>> flooding con

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-16 Thread Tim Moore
Frederic Bouvier wrote: > - "Tim Moore" a écrit : > >> Reminder: >> git-clone git://repo.or.cz/simgear.git >> git-clone git://repo.or.cz/flightgear.git > > $ git-clone git://repo.or.cz/simgear.git > remote: Counting objects: 9905, done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2188/2188), done. >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-15 Thread Frederic Bouvier
- "Tim Moore" a écrit : > There has been a flurry of bug fixes in the last few days. I want to > review the > state of the maint branches in the simgear and flightgear git > repositories and > suggest that they would now be a good source for a 1.9.1 bug fix > release. I've > been fairly co

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread Stuart Buchanan
gerard robin wrote: > On jeudi 15 janvier 2009, James Turner wrote: > > On 14 Jan 2009, at 23:56, gerard robin wrote: > > > AND what about clouds with blue_edge ? > > > > > > http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/3DClouds-blue_edge.jpg > > > > I'd say, not worth delaying 1.9.1 for - unless there is a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread Stuart Buchanan
James Turner wrote: >On 14 Jan 2009, at 23:56, gerard robin wrote: >> >>AND what about clouds with blue_edge ? >> >>http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/3DClouds-blue_edge.jpg > > I'd say, not worth delaying 1.9.1 for - unless there is a low-risk fix, which > I doubt, > since it appears to be a sor

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread gerard robin
On jeudi 15 janvier 2009, James Turner wrote: > On 14 Jan 2009, at 23:56, gerard robin wrote: > > AND what about clouds with blue_edge ? > > > > http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/3DClouds-blue_edge.jpg > > I'd say, not worth delaying 1.9.1 for - unless there is a low-risk > fix, which I doubt, sin

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread James Turner
On 14 Jan 2009, at 23:56, gerard robin wrote: AND what about clouds with blue_edge ? http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/3DClouds-blue_edge.jpg I'd say, not worth delaying 1.9.1 for - unless there is a low-risk fix, which I doubt, since it appears to be a sorting issue. 'Clouds look a bit

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread Csaba Halász
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:56 AM, James Turner wrote: > > On 14 Jan 2009, at 23:40, Csaba Halász wrote: > >> There are some pending NaN problems I have reported, but have not >> been fixed. >> And users are complaining about IntersectionVisitor/CullVisitor >> flooding console with messages about N

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread James Turner
On 14 Jan 2009, at 23:40, Csaba Halász wrote: > There are some pending NaN problems I have reported, but have not > been fixed. > And users are complaining about IntersectionVisitor/CullVisitor > flooding console with messages about NaNs ;) Between Fred, Tim and myself, I thought we'd committe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread gerard robin
On jeudi 15 janvier 2009, Csaba Halász wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Tim Moore wrote: > > There has been a flurry of bug fixes in the last few days. I want to > > review the state of the maint branches in the simgear and flightgear git > > repositories and suggest that they would now

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread James Turner
On 14 Jan 2009, at 23:31, Tim Moore wrote: > There has been a flurry of bug fixes in the last few days. I want to > review the > state of the maint branches in the simgear and flightgear git > repositories and > suggest that they would now be a good source for a 1.9.1 bug fix > release. I'v

Re: [Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread Csaba Halász
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Tim Moore wrote: > There has been a flurry of bug fixes in the last few days. I want to review > the > state of the maint branches in the simgear and flightgear git repositories and > suggest that they would now be a good source for a 1.9.1 bug fix release. I've

[Flightgear-devel] proposed 1.9.1

2009-01-14 Thread Tim Moore
There has been a flurry of bug fixes in the last few days. I want to review the state of the maint branches in the simgear and flightgear git repositories and suggest that they would now be a good source for a 1.9.1 bug fix release. I've been fairly conservative and have been only checking fixes