Re: [Flightgear-devel] the garden of forking xml

2008-12-27 Thread John Denker
On 12/26/2008 08:24 PM, Ron Jensen wrote: IMHO we would be way ahead of the game if DP's upgrades had been incorporated in the library copy in Aircraft/Instruments-3d/, rather than being confined to a private pa24-only copy. Sometimes it pays to put all your eggs in one basket, and then do

[Flightgear-devel] the garden of forking xml

2008-12-26 Thread John Denker
Question: In the current CVS, why are there five inequivalent copies (six copies total) of kr87.xml? Similarly, why are there four inequivalent copies of kx165*1.xml? And other examples Other things being equal, such lack of modularity might be somewhat suboptimal from the point

Re: [Flightgear-devel] the garden of forking xml

2008-12-26 Thread dave perry
John Denker wrote: Question: In the current CVS, why are there five inequivalent copies (six copies total) of kr87.xml? Similarly, why are there four inequivalent copies of kx165*1.xml? And other examples Other things being equal, such lack of modularity might be somewhat

Re: [Flightgear-devel] the garden of forking xml

2008-12-26 Thread John Denker
On 12/26/2008 06:26 PM, dave perry wrote: John Denker wrote: Question: In the current CVS, why are there five inequivalent copies (six copies total) of kr87.xml? Similarly, why are there four inequivalent copies of kx165*1.xml? And other examples Other things being equal,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] the garden of forking xml

2008-12-26 Thread Ron Jensen
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 18:48 -0700, John Denker wrote: On 12/26/2008 06:26 PM, dave perry wrote: John Denker wrote: Question: In the current CVS, why are there five inequivalent copies (six copies total) of kr87.xml? Similarly, why are there four inequivalent copies of kx165*1.xml?