On 6/25/07, John Denker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At runtime, FGFS checks the version level of its data tree;
> I wonder if at compile time it could check the version level
> of the required libraries.
Configure checks for that, but it only works for releases.
It does not follow development i
On 06/24/2007 07:55 PM, Csaba Halász wrote:
> You need to update simgear
Yup.
I wonder if there's a way to print a more user-friendly
message in this case.
At runtime, FGFS checks the version level of its data tree;
I wonder if at compile time it could check the version level
of the required l
On 6/25/07, John Denker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the latest CVS, I observe:
>
> wxradar.cxx:358: error: 'class SGWxRadarEcho' has no member named 'aircraft'
You need to update simgear (assuming the necessary change went into cvs).
--
Csaba
--
With the latest CVS, I observe:
wxradar.cxx: In member function 'virtual void wxRadarBg::update(double)':
wxradar.cxx:358: error: 'class SGWxRadarEcho' has no member named 'aircraft'
wxradar.cxx:375: error: 'class SGWxRadarEcho' has no member named 'bearing'
wxradar.cxx:417: error: 'class SGWxRada
Here are some hints on how to build fgfs from source. This is what I
have had to do to get it to come anywhere /close/ to working on Debian
etch; there are still compilation errors.
If anybody has corrections or further suggestions, please speak up.
Also, I point out (again) that the instruction
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 19:59 +, Martin Spott wrote:
> > I was naive enough to enstall the Debian version, but it's lacking the
> > patches to make it work with FlightGear, so I had to use apt to pull the
> > Debian sources[1], applied the FlightGear patch [2] file, and rebuilt it
> > with dpkg-b
Ron Jensen wrote:
> I was naive enough to enstall the Debian version, but it's lacking the
> patches to make it work with FlightGear, so I had to use apt to pull the
> Debian sources[1], applied the FlightGear patch [2] file, and rebuilt it
> with dpkg-build [3]...
Thanks for this explanation !
D
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 21:21 +0100, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 January 2007 16:42, John Denker wrote:
> > Uhhh, what has OSG got to do with it? I don't see an OSG requirement
> > mentioned anywhere in the documentation.
> >
> > Do I need OSG on top of plib? Or OSG instead of plib? I
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 16:42, John Denker wrote:
> Uhhh, what has OSG got to do with it? I don't see an OSG requirement
> mentioned anywhere in the documentation.
>
> Do I need OSG on top of plib? Or OSG instead of plib? Is this optional,
> or is it a new requirement?
OSG on top of plib. We
On 01/02/2007 12:09 AM, Ron Jensen wrote:
> I find including more libraries in some of
> the Makefile.am's does the trick for me... I'm attaching a diff of my
> debian-etch build tree against today's CVS.
Thanks for the patches. They applied cleanly to the bleeding edge package
but utterly fail
10 matches
Mail list logo
