-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Fwd: Re: Curtis - small change of
UFO.cxx possible?]
Datum: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:49:22 +0100
Von: Georg Vollnhals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Referenzen: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Melchior FRANZ schrieb:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 11 March 2006 18:09:
Taking into account that some people don't calibrate their joysticks
is yet another bad idea.
OTOH, we could ignore throttle values < 0.05 or something. Even after
calibrating the lowest throttle value may not always be 0 in the end
position. (?)
m.
Hi Melchior,
my answer to Geoff was *not* meant in a bad way. I even could not test
your solution until now :-). The only theoretical advantage of the
"gear-down/up" version could be a faster switching from high to low
speed, therefore I wrote that a "self-compiler" can choose the preferred
version himself. But I agree that a general solution is much better for
the long run and the different necessaries.
I am very lucky about the general improvement and have already fixed
this in my manual for the upcoming FGTools version 1.4 what I am writing
now. And that you did it so fast that it will be in version 0.9.10!!!
Beside that, I know you C++ coders can squeeze a whole program into one
line :-)
Thank you once again
Georg
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
