Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM

2013-08-17 Thread Pat
ceforge.net > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 03:02:37 +0200 > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM > > > > > Hi Holger, > > I'm glad to know that FGCom integration is surprising you. > It seems you have a pretty well vision of the perfect solution for > radio s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM

2013-08-17 Thread TDO Brandano
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 03:02:37 +0200 Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM Hi Holger, I'm glad to know that FGCom integration is surprising you. It seems you have a pretty well vision of the perfect solution for radio simulation and I agree with you on this "how-it-should-works&

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM

2013-08-16 Thread Clement de l'Hamaide
Hi Holger, I'm glad to know that FGCom integration is surprising you. It seems you have a pretty well vision of the perfect solution for radio simulation and I agree with you on this "how-it-should-works". As James said, all of this is mostly based on P2P architecture which is far to be the easi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgcom UK problem

2013-02-25 Thread Roland Haeder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/25/2013 05:03 PM, Geoff McLane wrote: > Any information welcome... As I know, you got both available. :) Regards, Roland -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCom -> cmake

2012-07-11 Thread HB-GRAL
Am 10.07.12 20:50, schrieb Christian Schmitt: > Awesome! I waited for just that, because current fgcom has not seen any > change for a long time. Alreadey did a quick test and I think you will get > some merge requests soon :) > > Cheers, > Chris Hi Chris I can also add you as contributor and you

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCom -> cmake

2012-07-11 Thread HB-GRAL
Hi Thorsten Many thanks for your patch. Yes, it is thought as external cmake option and your patch is just one step ahead ;-) Cheers, Yves Am 10.07.12 20:52, schrieb ThorstenB: > Am 10.07.2012 15:27, schrieb HB-GRAL: >> The last weeks Geoff McLane and me forked fgcom temporary at gitorious >> (

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCom -> cmake

2012-07-11 Thread ys
Hi Martin Did you pull, compile and test, any real feedback? Cheers, Yves Ps. We are aware of the next monster, thanks. Fgcom 1.2ff is working and still a nice piece. I guess you will find a lot of latest development from Holger Wirtz and Charles Ingels at sourceforge. I don't know if Holger W

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCom -> cmake

2012-07-10 Thread Martin Spott
ThorstenB wrote: > Schön wieder Fortschritte bei fgcom zu sehen. Und schön CMake + Git zu > sehen ;-). Habt ihr auch mal Holger Wirtz kontaktiert? Unfortunately Holger is unable to contribute to FGCom any more, but with a bit of luck he'll probably give access to his latest state of develoment (

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCom -> cmake

2012-07-10 Thread ThorstenB
Ah well. You guessed the obvious... This was mainly meant for HB-GRAL. Anyway, an opportunity to learn some German! ;-) cheers, Thorsten Am 10.07.2012 20:52, schrieb ThorstenB: > Am 10.07.2012 15:27, schrieb HB-GRAL: >> The last weeks Geoff McLane and me forked fgcom temporary at gitorious >> (ht

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCom -> cmake

2012-07-10 Thread ThorstenB
Am 10.07.2012 15:27, schrieb HB-GRAL: The last weeks Geoff McLane and me forked fgcom temporary at gitorious (http://www.gitorious.org/fgcom) and made some significant changes. Origin source is still available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/fgcom/ Schön wieder Fortschritte bei fgcom zu sehe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCom -> cmake

2012-07-10 Thread Christian Schmitt
Awesome! I waited for just that, because current fgcom has not seen any change for a long time. Alreadey did a quick test and I think you will get some merge requests soon :) Cheers, Chris HB-GRAL wrote: > Hi all > > The last weeks Geoff McLane and me forked fgcom temporary at gitorious > (h

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting help...

2009-08-11 Thread Robert Black
; *From:* "Rob Shearman, Jr." > *To:* FlightGear developers discussions > > *Sent:* Monday, August 10, 2009 10:09:42 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting help... > > MMM. Still struggling with this. > > In the Windows FG install, the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting help...

2009-08-11 Thread Rob Shearman, Jr.
Transportation also known as rm...@umd.edu From: "Rob Shearman, Jr." To: FlightGear developers discussions Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:09:42 PM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting help... MMM. Still struggling with this. In the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting help...

2009-08-10 Thread Rob Shearman, Jr.
ion also known as rm...@umd.edu From: Jacob Burbach To: FlightGear developers discussions Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:16:21 PM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting help... Does flightgear run the the OpenAL installer during setup, or does it jus

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting help...

2009-08-10 Thread Jacob Burbach
Does flightgear run the the OpenAL installer during setup, or does it just come with it's own dll? If there is an openal dll in the same directory as fgcom it will use that, regardless of anyone you install system wide I believe. If there is an openal dll there with the exe, try moving it or renami

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting help...

2009-08-10 Thread Rob Shearman, Jr.
ansit Operations Supervisor, University of Maryland Department of Transportation also known as rm...@umd.edu From: Jacob Burbach To: FlightGear developers discussions Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:51:47 PM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM troubleshooting help...

2009-08-10 Thread Jacob Burbach
> OpenAl function alcCaptureOpenDevice failed with code 0 > FATAL ERROR: cannot initialize iaxclient!" It's an OpenAL problem. Try installing the latest OpenAL from http://connect.creativelabs.com/openal/Downloads/Forms/AllItems.aspx ? -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM version 2.0pre

2008-02-22 Thread Nick Othieno
Hi Holger, Still need help with configs for my own asterisk server for fgcom. Nick On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Holger Wirtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am just amazed how nice bad sound can be if you try to use it in a > radio environment :-) Every VoIP'er thinks I am braindead

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM segfault

2008-02-06 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi Jester, Thanks, it works! On Feb 7, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Csaba Halász wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 4:50 PM, Tatsuhiro Nishioka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been testing fgcom, and I got a segfault. >> It shows "No free call appearances." and then bang! >> >> Does anyone know how to fi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM segfault

2008-02-06 Thread Csaba Halász
On Feb 6, 2008 4:50 PM, Tatsuhiro Nishioka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been testing fgcom, and I got a segfault. > It shows "No free call appearances." and then bang! > > Does anyone know how to fix this? > > According to gdb, it occures when trying to send a text message "HIER DIE >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: how to go on?

2008-02-02 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi there, > >> It would also open some further possibilities, such as text-to-speech >> or pre-recorded messages. >> Drawback is, we would lose the portaudio driver. I don't know if Tat >> used that or openal on Mac, and no idea if any windows users managed >> to get fgcom running at all. > > I ha

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: how to go on?

2008-02-01 Thread Holger Wirtz
Csaba, On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:34:46PM +0100, Csaba Hal?sz wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 8:48 AM, Holger Wirtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There is a nearly stable iaxc version 2 available which has some > > advantages (for VoIP, not necessarily for the usage with FG). The build > > system is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: how to go on?

2008-01-31 Thread Csaba Halász
On Jan 29, 2008 8:48 AM, Holger Wirtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is a nearly stable iaxc version 2 available which has some > advantages (for VoIP, not necessarily for the usage with FG). The build > system is now based on autotools which makes it complexer for me (I have > no idea about

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: how to go on?

2008-01-29 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi Holger, I think you should go for iaxc 2 for more realistic radio sound simulation, like Lo-Fi filter and noise reduction. If possible, Lo-Fi filter can be toggled with an option. If I were you, I would release the current version with iaxc 1after applying and testing the patches, and then wo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2008-01-24 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, sorry, this mail was thaught directly for Csaba's mailbox and not for the list... HOlger On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Holger Wirtz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 03:05:37PM +0100, Csaba Hal?sz wrote: > [...] > > I am onto it. Already got openal output working, input s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2008-01-24 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 03:05:37PM +0100, Csaba Hal?sz wrote: [...] > I am onto it. Already got openal output working, input shouldn't be > any problem either. This will be all software, as AnMaster proposed. [...] Just two questions: Have you ported the openal support for iaxclient to iaxcli

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM : sound card issues

2007-12-22 Thread jean pellotier
Csaba Halász a écrit : > On Dec 23, 2007 2:25 AM, jean pellotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> sorry, it just says "can't find a file matching" for pa_ringbuffer.h >> and pa_debugprint.h. >> > > Interesting. Doing a search of all the files the string pa_ringbuffer > is not mentioned anyw

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM : sound card issues

2007-12-22 Thread Csaba Halász
On Dec 23, 2007 2:25 AM, jean pellotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sorry, it just says "can't find a file matching" for pa_ringbuffer.h > and pa_debugprint.h. Interesting. Doing a search of all the files the string pa_ringbuffer is not mentioned anywhere. Maybe you have another iaxclient on y

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM : sound card issues

2007-12-22 Thread jean pellotier
Csaba Halász a écrit : > On Dec 22, 2007 11:36 AM, jean pellotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi alls, >> >> few issues with fgcom: >> >> - My PC is ready to test fgcom with jack, (adat card rme96/8) but I >> can't manage to compile with: USE_PA_JACK=1, >> >> the first lines of error are: >>

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM : sound card issues

2007-12-22 Thread Csaba Halász
On Dec 22, 2007 11:36 AM, jean pellotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi alls, > > few issues with fgcom: > > - My PC is ready to test fgcom with jack, (adat card rme96/8) but I > can't manage to compile with: USE_PA_JACK=1, > > the first lines of error are: > > portaudio/src/hostapi/jack/pa_jack.c

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM : sound card issues

2007-12-22 Thread alexis bory
jean pellotier wrote: > - at last, something about sound card config, yesterday we tryed to > be 3 in atc mode (a way to have air to air contact with curent fgcom) > but it was impossible for me to understand what other said, because > of lots of repeatable echo (suitable for reggae i think!!)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

2007-12-20 Thread Holger Wirtz
[...] > > The problem is: that has not much to do with VoIP - so you havn't any > > features of VoIP and no implementations for server and client. Feel free > > to do so :-) > > > > Perhaps someone can extend the IAX2 protocol and write a new > > app_meetme.so for Asterisk which ca realise this. B

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

2007-12-20 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:55:31AM +0100, AnMaster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Holger Wirtz wrote: > > Hi Arvid, > > No, yes, no... yes it's a kind of bug. I had such things not in mind as > > I wrote fgcom. There should be a feature that allows to use the e

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

2007-12-20 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Holger Wirtz wrote: > Hi, > > after thinking about this feature I recognized that there are some > problems: > > Real radio has a limited range. So you can use the same frequency at > every point on the world. If you can hear someone on the same fr

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

2007-12-20 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, after thinking about this feature I recognized that there are some problems: Real radio has a limited range. So you can use the same frequency at every point on the world. If you can hear someone on the same frequency depends on how much power his transmitter has (and some other physical rule

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

2007-12-19 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Holger Wirtz wrote: > Hi Arvid, > No, yes, no... yes it's a kind of bug. I had such things not in mind as > I wrote fgcom. There should be a feature that allows to use the echo box > even if you are authenticated to the server but this works only as

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

2007-12-18 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi Arvid, On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 07:47:59PM +0100, AnMaster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > So when will this be fixed. Considering the type of flights I normally make I > really need this feature. For example I was planning cross atlantic flight > with > in air r

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

2007-12-18 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 So when will this be fixed. Considering the type of flights I normally make I really need this feature. For example I was planning cross atlantic flight with in air refueling over mp using fgcom but until this BUG is fixed that is not possible. Becau

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM bug: Call rejected by remote

2007-12-18 Thread Csaba Halász
On Dec 18, 2007 5:36 PM, AnMaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I select a frequency that is not a tower freq for any nearby airport I > always get "Call rejected by remote". That is wrong, I should be able to use > any > frequency anywhere and talk to any aircraft within range. There is no

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: attn Holger, KNID TWR not in the phone book :/

2007-12-12 Thread Holger Wirtz
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:53:25PM +0100, alexis bory wrote: > Holger Wirtz wrote: > > Alexis, > > > > as I see there is KNID in apt.dat.gz... hmmm maybe a bug in my > > script? I will check this the next days. > > Ok, thanks. Ok, the problem was an older apt.dat.gz file. Please check out the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: attn Holger, KNID TWR not in the phone book :/

2007-12-11 Thread alexis bory
Robin Peel wrote: > Alexis: > > My mistake - I did not acknowledge your message. But I did receive that > update for KNID and it was first published in my 2007.09 data release. > > - Robin > Nice, thanks a lot. Alexis -

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: attn Holger, KNID TWR not in the phone book :/

2007-12-11 Thread Csaba Halász
On Dec 11, 2007 3:44 PM, Holger Wirtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:18:52PM +0100, alexis bory wrote: > > Hi holger, > > > > My favorite place, and also one of the nicest airfield in > > California doesn't appear in phonebook.txt. > > It's KNID, China Lake Naval Air Weapon

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: attn Holger, KNID TWR not in the phone book :/

2007-12-11 Thread alexis bory
Holger Wirtz wrote: > Alexis, > > as I see there is KNID in apt.dat.gz... hmmm maybe a bug in my > script? I will check this the next days. Ok, thanks. All the best, Alexis - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: attn Holger, KNID TWR not in the phone book :/

2007-12-11 Thread alexis bory
Holger Wirtz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:18:52PM +0100, alexis bory wrote: > > Is it possible for you to add it in the list ? > > > > phonebook.txt KNID TWR 120.15 China Lake > > NAWS > > > > positions.txt KNID,120.150,35.682298,-117.684753,TWR,China Lake > > NAWS > > Both files are gene

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: attn Holger, KNID TWR not in the phone book :/

2007-12-11 Thread Holger Wirtz
Alexis, as I see there is KNID in apt.dat.gz... hmmm maybe a bug in my script? I will check this the next days. Regards, Holger > > > > > - > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: attn Holger, KNID TWR not in the phone book :/

2007-12-11 Thread Holger Wirtz
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:18:52PM +0100, alexis bory wrote: > Hi holger, > > My favorite place, and also one of the nicest airfield in > California doesn't appear in phonebook.txt. > It's KNID, China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station. Maybe it is not ip apt.dat.gz? This is the source for the genera

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: attn Holger, KNID TWR not in the phone book :/

2007-12-11 Thread alexis bory
Chris Metzler wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:18:52 +0100 alexis bory wrote: > > Hi holger, > > > > My favorite place, and also one of the nicest airfield in > > California doesn't appear in phonebook.txt. It's KNID, China Lake > > Naval Air Weapons Station. > > > > Here some screenshot of this pl

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM: attn Holger, KNID TWR not in the phone book :/

2007-12-11 Thread Chris Metzler
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:18:52 +0100 alexis bory wrote: > > Hi holger, > > My favorite place, and also one of the nicest airfield in > California doesn't appear in phonebook.txt. > It's KNID, China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station. > > Here some screenshot of this place: > http://croo.murgl.org/fgfs/

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM gets a discussion page on the wiki

2007-11-26 Thread Willie Fleming
On Monday 26 November 2007 09:53:16 Holger Wirtz wrote: > Ok, but I see many things that should be solved at the same time. We > should create a list og topics to be done and we should try to give them > priorities and perhaps name who try to solve these topics. But where to > place this list? FG-

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM gets a discussion page on the wiki

2007-11-26 Thread Ralf Gerlich
Hello Holger! Holger Wirtz wrote: > 3.) as in real life there should be a mechanism for realising > crosstalking (e.g. the sender with the maximum of output pushes other > senders in the background) crosstalking in real-life more often happens to create interference which punishes those listening

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM gets a discussion page on the wiki

2007-11-26 Thread Holger Wirtz
Willie, On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 12:14:28PM +, Willie Fleming wrote: > http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=Talk:FGCOM > > Ive kicked this off with a request for _simplex_ comms and a wee moan about > voice quality. > > I used squawkBox once a couple of years back - I c

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM fails to compile. Still.

2007-11-23 Thread Robert Black
On Thursday 22 November 2007 03:09:40 pm AnMaster wrote: > /usr/include/alsa/global.h:134: error: redefinition of 'struct timeval' > /usr/include/alsa/global.h:139: error: redefinition of 'struct timespec' I got it to compile native alsa by going to global.h and deleting those timing lines betwee

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2007-11-23 Thread Csaba Halász
On Nov 23, 2007 11:50 AM, Holger Wirtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:42:42AM +0100, AnMaster wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > There are quite a few reasons why fgcom shouldn't touch mixer settings: > > 1) Changing/muting master prevent

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2007-11-23 Thread Holger Wirtz
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:23:22PM +0100, AnMaster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > I tried the Portaudio ALSA one, it compiled, on running: muted master. Jack I > don't have installed so I can't test that. And as stated before, native ALSA > does not compile. If it c

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2007-11-23 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I tried the Portaudio ALSA one, it compiled, on running: muted master. Jack I don't have installed so I can't test that. And as stated before, native ALSA does not compile. If it can't even keep track of what channel is Master and what one is MIC som

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2007-11-23 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Holger Wirtz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:42:42AM +0100, AnMaster wrote: > There are quite a few reasons why fgcom shouldn't touch mixer settings: > 1) Changing/muting master prevents sound from applications like flightgear and > festival (fli

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2007-11-23 Thread Holger Wirtz
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:42:42AM +0100, AnMaster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > There are quite a few reasons why fgcom shouldn't touch mixer settings: > 1) Changing/muting master prevents sound from applications like flightgear and > festival (flightgear got buil

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2007-11-23 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 There are quite a few reasons why fgcom shouldn't touch mixer settings: 1) Changing/muting master prevents sound from applications like flightgear and festival (flightgear got built in support for festival that I use) Even if there is a reason to mut

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2007-11-23 Thread Holger Wirtz
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:17:46AM +0100, AnMaster wrote: [...] > >> it would leave the mixer settings I use alone. I will wait for this bug to > >> get > >> fixed before I try it again. > > > > I must say that I haven't tried the OSS version until now. I hope that I > > can do this at weekend. A

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2007-11-23 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Holger Wirtz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:46:12PM +0100, AnMaster wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> So I tried FGCOM with OSS emulation, at last it compiled with jester's patch >> at >> http://pastebin.ca/7940

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM again, mixer mess

2007-11-23 Thread Holger Wirtz
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:46:12PM +0100, AnMaster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > So I tried FGCOM with OSS emulation, at last it compiled with jester's patch > at > http://pastebin.ca/794075. Now I tried it. Error. Ok, so I need to edit some > files it turns out a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGCOM fails to compile. Still.

2007-11-23 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:09:40PM +0100, AnMaster wrote: [...] > - -DAUDIO_ALSA -Ilibiax2/src -DLIBIAX -DSPEEX_EC=1 -DLINUX -c -o > audio_alsa.o > audio_alsa.c > In file included from /usr/include/alsa/asoundlib.h:44, > from audio_alsa.c:20: > /usr/include/alsa/global.h:1

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgcom problems...

2007-11-21 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi, On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:05:27PM +0100, AnMaster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Where exactly do I find the things listed at > http://squonk.abacab.org/dokuwiki/fgcom#requirements ? Several of them (all > the > asterix ones, the gsm one and some more) do not

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgcom is now available partially static linked

2007-09-19 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi all, On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:03:00AM +0200, Mirko Stanisak wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 schrieb Holger Wirtz: > > Hi all, > > > > I have put a new version (1.0.1) as a partially static linked binary in > > the tarball of fgcom. The new binary got the libiaxclient-2.1svn,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgcom is now available partially static linked

2007-09-19 Thread Mirko Stanisak
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 schrieb Holger Wirtz: > Hi all, > > I have put a new version (1.0.1) as a partially static linked binary in > the tarball of fgcom. The new binary got the libiaxclient-2.1svn, > libspeex and libgsm static linked. I hope this solves problems with > these librarie

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgcom

2007-07-14 Thread Holger Wirtz
Hi Emmanuel, On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:15:23PM +0200, BARANGER Emmanuel wrote: > I'm sorry but the mail of fgcom programmer is not avaible. I post my > message here. uuups... this should be mentioned on the web site. I will double check this on monday. My mail address ist [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >