Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-28 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, maybe this one: http://www.flyengravity.com/ Cheers > > Does anyone have any info on the cockpit panel shown at > about time 1:18 > in that video? > > I'm wondering what they used for the various displays. > > If it's known an e-mail address for the builder would be > appreciated! > > jj

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-28 Thread jj
Does anyone have any info on the cockpit panel shown at about time 1:18 in that video? I'm wondering what they used for the various displays. If it's known an e-mail address for the builder would be appreciated! jj http://kingmont.com jj On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 19:40 +, Heiko Schulz wrote

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-28 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, found a video on Youtube, showing some scenes from the FSweekend. And yes, we can see FlightGear:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCTo4Pfi1Mo&feature=related It starts at 1:24 starring Durk Talsma! There might be more videos as well! Regards HHS > Hi All, > > Last weekend we've been organiz

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-18 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Wolfram, On Monday 16 November 2009 04:20:52 pm Wolfram Kuss wrote: > Unfortunately I dont have time to write a long impression or "clean up" my > photos a lot, so here is simply a huge 150MB pack of fotos with a small > text file: > http://www.3d-raumplan.com/wk_privat/Fotos_FSWeekend.rar > >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-16 Thread Wolfram Kuss
Unfortunately I dont have time to write a long impression or "clean up" my photos a lot, so here is simply a huge 150MB pack of fotos with a small text file: http://www.3d-raumplan.com/wk_privat/Fotos_FSWeekend.rar It was my first FS Weekend and I was surprised at how large both the museum and the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-10 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Martin, On Tuesday 10 November 2009 03:13:13 pm Martin Spott wrote: > Torsten Dreyer wrote:> On the tour back to Enschede on sunday evening we realized that our > booth most probably pulled a _lot_ more power than the specification > for a single plug allows ;-) > Quite surprising that we did

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-10 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi, On Tuesday 10 November 2009 02:48:00 pm Torsten Dreyer wrote: > Curt wrote: > > I recognized Martin, Torsten, and Durk in the pictures. I assume Durk Correct assumption. I guess you know a little about my other hobbies... :-) FWIW, there are a few notes below the pictures, occasionally givi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-10 Thread Martin Spott
Torsten Dreyer wrote: > I was especially impressed that it is possible to bring five individual > computers, more than 15 TFT monitors, yokes, joysticks, dozens of cables, > several USB hubs, a projector, network switches, a UMTS router, several > notebook computers and a coffee maker, [...] O

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-10 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Durk Talsma wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Last weekend we've been organizing a booth at FSWeekend again. I'll try > > to write a few more elaborate set of impressions later, however, let me > > just say > > that our booth was quite large this year. :-) In the mean ti

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2009-11-09 Thread Curtis Olson
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Durk Talsma wrote: > Hi All, > > Last weekend we've been organizing a booth at FSWeekend again. I'll try to > write a few more elaborate set of impressions later, however, let me just > say > that our booth was quite large this year. :-) In the mean time, here are

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2008-11-03 Thread Jon Stockill
Martin Spott wrote: > James Turner wrote: > >> Some points to keep in mind for LinuxTag booth planning, assuming >> people are going? > > I'm pretty certain that we're going to keep our schedule and to be > present on LinuxTag next year - although we yet have to find a small > aircraft to place

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2008-11-03 Thread Martin Spott
Thomas F??rster wrote: > Am Montag 03 November 2008 schrieb Martin Spott: > > Somewhen in the past we've been starting the "FlightGear Expo > > Checklist" page on the wiki (you won't find the page without using a > > seach engine) > Sometimes a little link might help... ;) > > http://wiki.fligh

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2008-11-03 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Montag 03 November 2008 schrieb Martin Spott: > Somewhen in the past we've been starting the "FlightGear Expo > Checklist" page on the wiki (you won't find the page without using a > seach engine) Sometimes a little link might help... ;) http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/FlightGear_Expo_Ch

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2008-11-03 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Torsten, >> > > Want pictures? > > http://www.t3r.de/flightpics/fsweekend2008/ > > Sending this from work by webmail: let's hope it works: Here's a quote from the X-plane.org forum: "At FSWeekend there was a guy from the open-source flight simulator FlightGear too. He had this large FlightGe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2008-11-03 Thread Martin Spott
James Turner wrote: > Some points to keep in mind for LinuxTag booth planning, assuming > people are going? I'm pretty certain that we're going to keep our schedule and to be present on LinuxTag next year - although we yet have to find a small aircraft to place onto the booth :-) Somewhen in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2008-11-03 Thread James Turner
On 2 Nov 2008, at 23:17, Durk Talsma wrote: > To summarize, FSWeekend 2008 has been a lot of fun for me, and I > hope also for > the rest of the crew. I certainly hop to organize another booth next > year. I > hope to post some photo's later. I will have to reconnect my server > again, so >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend impressions

2008-11-03 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> setup. We also didn't do that many multiplayer demos this year. This year's > booth setup was actually not really ideal for that; one get's the best > impression when one can watch the two participating parties at the same > time. With some minor rearrangements this should be possible, and I woul