> > c) Doesn't 213 seem like a small number compared to the thousands of
> > updates that have been applied to Robin's apt.dat since FG forked
> > it in 2008?
>
> If you are looking for a project, we need someone to incorporate the
> new X-Plane format into TerraGear - while keeping polygon counts
> c) Doesn't 213 seem like a small number compared to the thousands of
> updates that have been applied to Robin's apt.dat since FG forked
> it in 2008?
If you are looking for a project, we need someone to incorporate the new
X-Plane format into TerraGear - while keeping polygon counts as low as
John Denker wrote:
> On 01/16/2011 02:23 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
>> John Denker wrote:
>>> FG is still using airport data that hasn't been updated since 2008.
>>
>> Depends on your particular definition of "FG". To be precise, the file
>> at:
>>
>> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/apt.dat.gz
On 01/16/2011 02:23 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> John Denker wrote:
>
>> FG is still using airport data that hasn't been updated since 2008.
>
> Depends on your particular definition of "FG". To be precise, the file
> at:
>
> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/apt.dat.gz [1]
>
> contains 21
Unfortunately most of the users are not using or able to create individual
Terrain builds. If I could without taking computer courses I would, just to
make use of those 213 airfield updates! :) :)
…trying to be patient.
Peter :)
On Jan 16, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> John Denker
Hi,
I have sent Martin an updated layout for KTPA. As is my understanding, thie
runways will be updated in the next world scenery build, unless I've done
something wrong.
Cheers
John
--
Protect Your Site and Customers
John Denker wrote:
> FG is still using airport data that hasn't been updated since 2008.
Depends on your particular definition of "FG". To be precise, the file
at:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/apt.dat.gz
contains 213 airfield updates (currently) which have been merged over
the time, which
On 01/16/2011 01:25 PM, Barry Fawthrop wrote:
> There was a news article on Magnetic North Change
> and How KTPA had to change from 90 to 80
>
> Are these changes being effected into FlightGear ???
No.
FG is still using airport data that hasn't been updated since 2008.
More than a few things
Barry Fawthrop wrote:
> There was a news article on Magnetic North Change
> and How KTPA had to change from 90 to 80
>
> Are these changes being effected into FlightGear ???
Depends on if anyone's submitting a modified layout.
Actually the runway directions are hardwired into our airfield lay
9 matches
Mail list logo
