On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 10:34:33 +0200, Torsten wrote in message
> <4e214d19.20...@t3r.de>:
>
>> > ..how about historical weather from e.g. air crash reports?
>> >
>> fgfs --metar="add any metar you want here"
>
> ..replacing METAR IDs with a data
Am 16.07.2011 17:37, schrieb Arnt Karlsen:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 10:34:33 +0200, Torsten wrote in message
> <4e214d19.20...@t3r.de>:
>
>>> ..how about historical weather from e.g. air crash reports?
>>>
>> fgfs --metar="add any metar you want here"
>
> ..replacing METAR IDs with a data file that FG
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 10:34:33 +0200, Torsten wrote in message
<4e214d19.20...@t3r.de>:
> > ..how about historical weather from e.g. air crash reports?
> >
> fgfs --metar="add any metar you want here"
..replacing METAR IDs with a data file that FG reads to
emulate the historical weather??? Would
> ..how about historical weather from e.g. air crash reports?
>
fgfs --metar="add any metar you want here"
--
AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric
Ries, the creator of the Lean Startup Metho
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:38:21 +0100, Stuart wrote in message
:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 7:33 AM, wrote:
> >> Sounds logical to me ...the double weather systems are a bit of
> >> nuisance , would be nicer, in my opinion , if they could be
> >> combined in a single dialog but not sure if tha
> I also wonder if the terms "global" and "local" are really applicable.
> Would
> "static weather modeling" and "dynamic weather modeling be better terms,
> or how about simple/complex?
I guess the key differences in philosophy are:
* terrain interaction: clouds in Local Weather 'know' terrain
> Stuart wrote:
>
> 1) Currently there is a wireframe option on the Rendering menu. While
> it's of moderate interest to developers, I don't think it's really of
> any interest to the average user. I'd like to move this option to the
> Debug menu.
The reason I added it is that we got quite some
On Monday, July 11, 2011 05:37:06 AM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> I think we've gone beyond what can be done for the upcoming
> release, but comments below.
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 7:30 AM,thorsten.i.renk wrote:
> >> 2) As it stands, it's very difficult for a new user to understa
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 7:33 AM, wrote:
>> Sounds logical to me ...the double weather systems are a bit of
>> nuisance , would be nicer, in my opinion , if they could be combined
>> in a single dialog but not sure if that's possible.I use real
>> world weather anyway , so i never use those s
Hi Thorsten,
I think we've gone beyond what can be done for the upcoming
release, but comments below.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 7:30 AM,thorsten.i.renk wrote:
>> 2) As it stands, it's very difficult for a new user to understand the
>> difference between Local Weather and Global Weather. let alone h
> Sounds logical to me ...the double weather systems are a bit of
> nuisance , would be nicer, in my opinion , if they could be combined
> in a single dialog but not sure if that's possible.I use real
> world weather anyway , so i never use those settings.
That misses the point - you can use
> 2) As it stands, it's very difficult for a new user to understand the
> difference between Local Weather and Global Weather. let alone how
> they inter-relate. Enabling the Local Weather package requires
> setting "Enabled local weather module" from the Local Weather Settings
> menu, yet the res
Sounds logical to me ...the double weather systems are a bit of
nuisance , would be nicer, in my opinion , if they could be combined
in a single dialog but not sure if that's possible.I use real
world weather anyway , so i never use those settings.
Cheers
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Stua
13 matches
Mail list logo
