Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-22 Thread Durk Talsma
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: I recall Durk Talsma was once telling about an in-house (closed source) fgfs-based system with a huge number of AI planes, in the tens of thousands IIRC. Probably not all talking to the same tower though? Yes, I have indeed a database of worldwide traffic at home c

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-19 Thread David Luff
Vassilii Khachaturov writes: > > I recall Durk Talsma was once telling about an in-house (closed source) > fgfs-based system with a huge number of AI planes, in the tens of > thousands IIRC. Probably not all talking to the same tower though? > Durk's stuff is all still the scripted AI as far as

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-19 Thread David Luff
Melchior FRANZ writes: > First off, I want to say that I don't want to put David's work down. This > *is* a complicated matter, and *much* work went into it, and the feature > works very well (when it works) and I enjoy it a lot. It's really only the > crashes that are annoying, and the fact that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-19 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
> I would say that tracking the state in the plane record is a must. There's > really no other place where this belongs. Using just one list is an option. > We don't have *that* many aircraft around. The highest number that I ever > saw were ~75 aircraft, but most of the time it's around 30. Going

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-19 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Quoting Melchior FRANZ : > * Frederic Bouvier -- Tuesday 18 April 2006 23:13: > > What about applying the simple patch attached. It doesn't cure the > > double entries problem, but it ensures that no valid memory is returned > > to the system before all references on it are released. > > Almost ev

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Melchior FRANZ a écrit : > * Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 15 April 2006 20:58: > >> Apart from the crashes ATC worked and works nicely, and it would really >> be great if one could now have it enabled and not have to fear abrupt >> exits. >> > > Damn, I still get crashes in tower.cxx ... >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-15 Thread David Luff
Melchior FRANZ writes: > * Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 15 April 2006 20:58: > > Apart from the crashes ATC worked and works nicely, and it would really > > be great if one could now have it enabled and not have to fear abrupt > > exits. > > Damn, I still get crashes in tower.cxx ... > What are y

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: tower.cxx

2006-04-15 Thread David Luff
Melchior FRANZ writes: > * Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 13 April 2006 17:06: > > Can we *please* finally fix the notorious crashes in tower.cxx? > > And, yes, I really meant "we". But as it looks, I'm pretty much on my > own (apart from Olaf who did a lot of the hard work already). > > Now the cau