Since there was some problem with the wiki article, I'll just say that
there is some on-going work on a stand-alone ATC client and I'll keep
working on it.
And taking the opportunity... if someone wants to join the project, give
ideas, requests or opinions, feel free to do so. The repository is he
Fernando García wrote:
> But I guess it is not that useless.
Well, but the wording "You are advised not to start working on anything
directly related to this" is highly inappropriate. Apparently someone
has completely failed to understand the topic.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user f
But I guess it is not that useless. A stand-alone ATC client can really
get affected by Canvas, even more now that people are working on an ATC
aircraft using Canvas. I would leave that comment since (at least for
me) it was useful.
Icecode.
Fernando García Liñán wrote:
> Sure: http://wiki.flightgear.org/Stand_Alone_ATC_Control_Development
Thanks - I took the freedom to remove the stupid comment ;-)
Thanks,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
---
Sure: http://wiki.flightgear.org/Stand_Alone_ATC_Control_Development
2012/10/8 Martin Spott
> Fernando García Liñán wrote:
>
> > So as said in the FlightGear's wiki article about the subject, [...]
>
> Do you have an URL available ?
>
> Martin.
> --
> Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
Fernando García Liñán wrote:
> So as said in the FlightGear's wiki article about the subject, [...]
Do you have an URL available ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
6 matches
Mail list logo
