RE: [Flightgear-devel] Two different problems with c172p and c172r

> Thanks for the file. It fixed the seg fault. > But C172R seems to suffer the same lower-than-RL max RPM as C172P (2200 > vs 2400), and as such cannot climb at the expected rate. > Do they share some engine spec file that may have been modifed recently? > Yavuz Onder I don't think so. I've got

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Two different problems with c172p and c172r

Ron Jensen wrote: On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 17:23 -0400, Yavuz Onder wrote: Hi, Failing to get the performance I need from C172P, I decided to try C172R, it seg faulted with this output: ~/ob/FlightGear-0.9/source$ fly --aircraft=c172r --airport=LSTS --runway=14 Model Author: Unk

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Two different problems with c172p and c172r

On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 17:23 -0400, Yavuz Onder wrote: > Hi, > > Failing to get the performance I need from C172P, I decided to try > C172R, it seg faulted with this output: > > ~/ob/FlightGear-0.9/source$ fly --aircraft=c172r --airport=LSTS > --runway=14 > Model Author: Unknown >