> I just greped through the current CVS aircraft and found the following
> results:
>
> 51 Aircraft and the generic-autopilot uses the pi-simple-controller
>
> 49 of these aircraft and the generic-autopilot uses the
> pi-simple-controller with a Ki of zero aka P-only
>
> the remaining 2 Aircraf
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, leee wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
>> leee wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
That might provide some idea of how much of an issue this is,
though obviously doesn't address non-CVS aircraft.
>>>
>>> This is exactly th
leee wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
>> In a continuous process of improving FlightGear there's no point
>> in keeping an 'undesired' (or, in some cases even a buggy)
>> feature as being the default just because some unknown 3rd party
>> software _might_ depend on it.
>> If
> On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:55 PM, leee wrote:
> > > There is always a risk associated with changing default
> > > behaviour and the bottom line is that there is no immediate
> > > need to do so, nor any overhead incurred by not doing so.
> > >
>
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
> leee wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> >> That might provide some idea of how much of an issue this is,
> >> though obviously doesn't address non-CVS aircraft.
> >
> > This is exactly the sort of think I'd hope to see at th
leee wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>> That might provide some idea of how much of an issue this is,
>> though obviously doesn't address non-CVS aircraft.
> This is exactly the sort of think I'd hope to see at the end of the
> transition/notification period and just be
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:55 PM, leee wrote:
> > There is always a risk associated with changing default
> > behaviour and the bottom line is that there is no immediate
> > need to do so, nor any overhead incurred by not doing so.
> >
> > This just
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:55 PM, leee wrote:
> There is always a risk associated with changing default behaviour
> and the bottom line is that there is no immediate need to do so,
> nor any overhead incurred by not doing so.
>
> This just seems like a commonsense policy to me, and was one of the
>
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:27 AM, leee wrote:
> > I agree that windup == bad and antiwindup == good, and that in
> > a perfect world no one would have leveraged windup and that
> > everyone would have implemented their PI simple controllers
> > correct
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:27 AM, leee wrote:
> I agree that windup == bad and antiwindup == good, and that in a
> perfect world no one would have leveraged windup and that everyone
> would have implemented their PI simple controllers correctly. The
> trouble is that It's not a perfect world.
>
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:50 AM, leee
wrote:
> > As this would be a new feature, and one which might affect
> > existing behaviours, I _really_ think it ought to be off by
> > default.
>
> I really can't imagine any sane system that is designed to
>
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:50 AM, leee wrote:
> As this would be a new feature, and one which might affect existing
> behaviours, I _really_ think it ought to be off by default.
>
I really can't imagine any sane system that is designed to leverage windup
as a feature. It's like closing your eyes
On Tuesday 09 Mar 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am about to commit a change that adds anti windup logic to
> > the pi-simple- controller (FGPISimpleController) which
> > currently lacks such functionality.
> >
> > The FGPIDContr
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am about to commit a change that adds anti windup logic to the pi-simple-
> controller (FGPISimpleController) which currently lacks such functionality.
>
> The FGPIDController has some anti windup logic but that controller does not
14 matches
Mail list logo
