Re: [Flightgear-devel] retraction issues

2007-01-15 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 15 January 2007: > There's only one acceptable solution: a fix for (c). Done. m. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance

Re: [Flightgear-devel] retraction issues

2007-01-15 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* John Denker -- Monday 15 January 2007: > There is legacy code wherein the user-interface directly manipulates > the gear-down property, via >a) the keyboard via keyboard.xml Not true. keyboard.xml uses the wrapper. >b) buttons on the joystick (e.g. X52.xml) Not true. X52.xml uses the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] retraction issues

2007-01-15 Thread Stefan Seifert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Douglas Campos wrote: > wouldn't be good a list of standard controls? in fact, if i remember, > some time ago that utility that tossed out config files for some > joystick, uses properties assignment... Not any more. Nowadays it uses $FG_ROOT/Input/Jo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] retraction issues

2007-01-15 Thread Douglas Campos
wouldn't be good a list of standard controls? in fact, if i remember, some time ago that utility that tossed out config files for some joystick, uses properties assignment... On 1/15/07, AJ MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 15 January 2007 18:50, John Denker wrote: > > Comments? Any

Re: [Flightgear-devel] retraction issues

2007-01-15 Thread AJ MacLeod
On Monday 15 January 2007 18:50, John Denker wrote: > Comments? Anybody have a better solution? Of course :-) The better solution already exists and just requires a/c modellers to use it. All joystick config files and keyboard assignments should use nasal control wrappers (see controls.nas) w