> What options are you using to invoke terrasync? I just tested it and it
> seems to work fine here. Do you have write access to the destination?
>
Sorry, it was my local problem indeed. I have a sgid setup to pull in the
terrasync'ed tree to a place where that group has access, that setup has a
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
One thing to check right off is if you remembered to recompile the
terrasync binary after fetching the newest source from cvs?
Just did another cvs up and toplevel make. Nothing was made. Checked the
date of the terrasync binary. It was from 5 minutes prior to
> One thing to check right off is if you remembered to recompile the
> terrasync binary after fetching the newest source from cvs?
Just did another cvs up and toplevel make. Nothing was made. Checked the
date of the terrasync binary. It was from 5 minutes prior to my 1st
attempt, and matches the o
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
Pulled in the latest cvs, including your terrasync update.
I tried to terrasync over my existing terrasynced 0.9.9 scenery subset.
Here's the exciting results --- this is when I tried to start at KOSH --
I have no files transferred, but instead a lot of messages like
> I have updated the rsync scenery server with v0.9.10 scenery. I have
> also updated the cvs version of terrasync to fetch the new
> objects/terrain structure properly.
>
> As with any thing, double check that terrasync is putting the files
> where you expect before you get too far with this.
Pu
Dave Perry wrote:
I notice that 0.9.9 scenery is available from several mirrors. Is
there an rsync capable site for Scenery-0.9.9?
I have updated the rsync scenery server with v0.9.10 scenery. I have
also updated the cvs version of terrasync to fetch the new
objects/terrain structure prop
6 matches
Mail list logo
