Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG point lights

2006-11-30 Thread Tim Moore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mathias Fröhlich wrote: > On Thursday 30 November 2006 01:36, Tim Moore wrote: >> Try http://www.bricoworks.com/moore/lightpt3.diff instead. A last-minute >> typo disabled point sprites. > This is still faster with point sprites reenabled? I'm not sure

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums integration thought

2006-11-30 Thread Jon Stockill
Alex Perry wrote: >> I know our development culture is built around mailing lists. I'm sure the >> FlightGear community will be decisively split between forums versus mailing >> lists if I ask people's preferences ... so I'm not expecting a consensus >> here. Is this anything that is worth explor

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums integration thought

2006-11-30 Thread Tim Moore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Stockill wrote: > Alex Perry wrote: >>> I know our development culture is built around mailing lists. I'm sure the >>> FlightGear community will be decisively split between forums versus mailing >>> lists if I ask people's preferences ... so I'm n

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Aircraft/Sikorsky-76C S76c.xml, 1.1, 1.2

2006-11-30 Thread wim van hoydonck
Hi, The following data is taken from Janes (S76c): Powerplant: 2 turbomeca Arriel 2S1 turboshafts with FADEC - each rated at 638 kW (856 shp) for take-off, - 731 kW (980 shp) OEI for 30 seconds, - 592 kW (794 shp) max continuous Standard fuel capacity: - 1083 litres of which 1064 lit

[Flightgear-devel] Initial Conditions at Reset

2006-11-30 Thread Thomas Biwer
Hello, I want to start FlightGear with a bunch of Initial Conditions Settings and I noticed that they dont seem to be loaded when restarting the simulator with "File->Reset". It rather looks like FG is taking the values for pitch, alpha, and so on off of the last session, i.e. if I crashed the pl

[Flightgear-devel] Linux - Solaris && AMD64-SPARC64 interfacing

2006-11-30 Thread Vikas N Kumar
Hi All I have an AMD64 machine that runs a 64-bit flavor of GNU/Linux. I have a Sun SPARC64 machine that runs Solaris 7 with a gnu compiler toolset. Now if I want to use both these machines to run FlightGear, will it work. Say I run Flightgear on the AMD64 and the panel display of FG on SPARC64. 1

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux - Solaris && AMD64-SPARC64 interfacing

2006-11-30 Thread Curtis Olson
On 11/30/06, Vikas N Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All I have an AMD64 machine that runs a 64-bit flavor of GNU/Linux. I have a Sun SPARC64 machine that runs Solaris 7 with a gnu compiler toolset. Now if I want to use both these machines to run FlightGear, will it work. Say I run Flightge

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Linux - Solaris && AMD64-SPARC64 interfacing

2006-11-30 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Vikas, "Vikas N Kumar" wrote: > Hi All > I have an AMD64 machine that runs a 64-bit flavor of GNU/Linux. > I have a Sun SPARC64 machine that runs Solaris 7 with a gnu compiler toolset. > Now if I want to use both these machines to run FlightGear, will it > work. Say I run Flightgear on the AMD

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-30 Thread Jim Wilson
> From: "Curtis Olson" > > Now that I am hosting the FlightGear web site with a commercial hosting > service, it becomes quite easy to setup online "forums" using phpBB2. > > I know our development culture is built around mailing lists. I'm sure the > FlightGear community will be decisively sp

[Flightgear-devel] Scenery development in Magdeburg (Germany)

2006-11-30 Thread Roberto Inzerillo
If you speak german, and are interested in scenery development, take a look at what City Magdeburg have done with vritual reality. Frauhofer Institut (remember MP3) is providing the technology. Start the video at min 07:27 Roberto ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-30 Thread Melchior FRANZ
I don't really care about which form is used for user support. If passers-by prefer a web-based forum, then this *may* be the better choice. (But also consider that someone has to do the support. These are to a certain degree developers, so even here it's not unimportant what those prefer. Unless w

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-30 Thread Martin Spott
Melchior FRANZ wrote: > I'm sure if I thought about it longer I would find some more > arguments. I have one to add: You need a graphical desktop in order to deal with the web forum because 'browsing' this forum with Lynx is a PITA (this is one of the rare occasions that I use this acronym ;-)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Forums?

2006-11-30 Thread Douglas Campos
+1 for users forum -1000 for developers forum just my 0.01 cents. On 11/30/06, Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > > I'm sure if I thought about it longer I would find some more > > arguments. > > I have one to add: You need a graphical desktop in order to deal