[Flightgear-devel] simgear::strutils::convertToLowerCase link error.

2009-09-30 Thread Scott Hamilton
I did a CVS update of SimGear and FG yesterday and I'm getting linker errors, but I don't understand why? ../../src/Navaids/libNavaids.a(positioned.o): In function `FGPositioned::typeFromName(std::basic_string, std::allocator > const&)': /home/scotth/Downloads/FlightGear/CVS-1.0/source/src/N

[Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Just the word bug and track are enough to scare pilots. So The concept is to set up a tracking system for bugs. So u must have at least one winge.. http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/ lets fix them ;-) pete -- Com

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing. My thoughts & hopes are that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual move away from CVS, We would move our code to a system that offers a number of developer features including an integrated bug tracker. Google does offer a nice

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread George Patterson
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Curtis Olson wrote: > I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing.  My thoughts & hopes are > that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual move away from > CVS,  We would move our code to a system that offers a number of developer > features in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Curtis Olson wrote: > I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing. My thoughts & > hopes are that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual > move away from CVS, We would move our code to a system that offers a > number of developer features including an integrated bug trac

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Pete Morgan wrote: > Curtis Olson wrote: > > I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing. My thoughts & > > hopes are that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual > > move away from CVS, We would move our code to a system that offers a > >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Gorilla thanks. U kinda exlained what's needed.. My vision it to "filter" the results and then have a direction of things to fix from user reports... Users are our best friends.. who can complain to their hearts content.. The issue now is that we need to "register" and recongise all the failu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Precisley the problem is that me as amuppet doth not know where the issue ie at, and where to report. So at least if we can point users to a particular point, then they can be filtered and sorted. therby dipatched to the concerned. At the moment its real crap.. so at least I want to use goog

[Flightgear-devel] Bug Tracking != Source code

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Source code != bug tracking.. -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile appli

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
I'm just not sure how productive it is to register yet another separate google project simply to use the bug tracker. Why not use the bug tracker at code.google.com/p/flightgear? I've been holding off pushing any particular bug tracking system, because it really makes a lot of sense to co-locate

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Hi, > Curtis Olson wrote: > > Why not use the bug tracker at code.google.com/p/flightgear? Is it just me or does that project not exist? The link gives an error page and the project does not show up when searching for FlightGear on Google Code. The simgear one does exist... Cheers, G

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
code.google.com/p/flightgea r = 404 ??? I am interested in the bug tracking bit Will make life easier for all -) Pete Krash handler FG.uk PLC Curtis Olson wrote: > I'm just not sure how productive it is to register yet another > separate google project sim

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
same here ? Gijs de Rooy wrote: > Hi, > > > Curtis Olson wrote: > > > > Why not use the bug tracker at code.google.com/p/flightgear > ? > > Is it just me or does that project not exist? The link gives an error > page and the project > does not show up whe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Source code control systems

2009-09-30 Thread Pablo Rogina
Pete Morgan wrote: > I do like the way qt uses it with merge requests. a lot of them to do > with documentation corrections, as well as minor touches to code. I was following this thread since I'm interested about opinions and thoughts about version control systems, from a software engineering pe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote: > Hi, > > > Curtis Olson wrote: > > > > Why not use the bug tracker at code.google.com/p/flightgear? > > Is it just me or does that project not exist? The link gives an error page > and the project > does not show up when searching for Flight

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
Curtis.. Thou needs to rise up and command the people. Please dictate where we can file bugs first.. -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to atten

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Source code control systems

2009-09-30 Thread Pete Morgan
So what would the "source tree" look like to you as a developer and pilot eg hanger/boeing/** Pablo Rogina wrote: > Pete Morgan wrote: > > > I do like the way qt uses it with merge requests. a lot of them to do > > with documentation corrections, as well as minor touches to code. > > I was foll

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Simgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/simgear/misc strutils.cxx, 1.4, 1.5 strutils.hxx, 1.4, 1.5

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
Hi Jim, I just noticed you added an OSG dependency to strutils.cxx/hxx If possible it would be nice to avoid adding graphics system dependencies to these text manipulation libraries. SimGear and SimGear code is used in a variety of places beyond FlightGear, even in embedded systems where compili

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Simgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/simgear/misc strutils.cxx, 1.4, 1.5 strutils.hxx, 1.4, 1.5

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
Ok, duh! I see that is a single character function, but there has to be a class function or it can't be too hard to whip up a little function ourselves. Thanks, Curt. On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Curtis Olson wrote: > Hi Jim, > > I just noticed you added an OSG dependency to strutils.cxx/

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Simgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/simgear/misc strutils.cxx, 1.4, 1.5 strutils.hxx, 1.4, 1.5

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Hollier
Hello, On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Curtis Olson wrote: > Ok, duh! I see that is a single character function, but there has to be a > class function or it can't be too hard to whip up a little function > ourselves. I don't think there's an STL function, but there is boost::to_lower(str) or

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear September Newsletter now available

2009-09-30 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi All, The September edition of The FlightGear Newsletter is now available: http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/FlightGear_Newsletter_September_2009 As always, we're looking for contributions to the next edition, so if you've done something interesting with FlightGear, please write up a coupl

[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update

2009-09-30 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi All, I've been doing some work to improve the 3D clouds. As well as a variety of bug fixes, improvements include:- - A new XML format - Texture indexing based on the position of the sprite in the cloud-mass, allowing more control over the texture set. - Improved fog and shading - Better sprit

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear September Newsletter now available

2009-09-30 Thread Curtis Olson
Hi Stuart, Thanks for keeping on top of the news letter. It is definitely appreciated! I like that you've kept it simple and concise. Thanks! Curt. On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Stuart Buchanan < stuart_d_bucha...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Hi All, > > The September edition of The FlightGear

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Vivian Meazza
Curt wrote 'git implementations under windows run fine' Who claims that? Not here they don't. I get constant glitches with cloned repos hanging - not only do they hang, but I can find no way out of the situation. I'm really p*ssed off with git right now. I'm in the anything but git camp today!

Re: [Flightgear-devel] bug tracking

2009-09-30 Thread Tim Moore
On 10/01/2009 12:13 AM, Vivian Meazza wrote: > Curt wrote > > > > ‘git implementations under windows run fine’ Who claims that? Not here > they don’t. I get constant glitches with cloned repos hanging – not only > do they hang, but I can find no way out of the situation. I’m really > p*ssed off

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Simgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/simgear/misc strutils.cxx, 1.4, 1.5 strutils.hxx, 1.4, 1.5

2009-09-30 Thread James Turner
On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:15, Simon Hollier wrote: > I don't think there's an STL function, but there is > boost::to_lower(str) or even something like: > > for (unsigned i=0; i < str.length(); ++i) { >str[i] = tolower(str[i]); > } I already chatted to Tim about this, I'm going to switch to the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update

2009-09-30 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Stuart, Unless somebody else beats me to it, I'll try to commit this patch this weekend. Thanks for this fine contribution, Cheers, Durk On Wednesday 30 September 2009 11:15:21 pm Stuart Buchanan wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been doing some work to improve the 3D clouds. > > As well as a vari