> You mentioned earlier that a lot of the performance issues would
> disappear
> if we could probe the terrain 100 times faster. I've been thinking about
> this for a while for ai traffic, skyop's moving map instrument, and
> weather.
>
> I'm thinking of storing some resolution of altitude data in
Erik wrote
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:24 +0200, grth_team wrote:
> > FG 2.4 consistency.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > You don't know us since we are newbee, (3 months working seriously
> > with FG).
> > We are a team ( 4 guys and a lady ).
> >
> > We have had several talks with several devel team person
If I may be permitted some personal comments about things which bug me?
I've been thinking quite a bit (possibly more than it's good for me)
triggered by responses on the list during the last days, and I would
perhaps take the time to clarify my position on a few things.
I get the impression that
> -Original Message-
> From: thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi [mailto:thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi]
> Sent: 14 July 2011 12:46
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Current Weather System...
>
>
> If I may be permitted some personal comments about things which bug me?
>
On 14 Jul 2011, at 12:46, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> Nasal has a garbage collection problem. One solution to it is - we avoid
> Nasal code wherever possible and try to hard-code everything. But Nasal
> crops up on a lot of places - complex aircraft such as the Concorde come
> to my mind, int
Okay, it isn't plain text (we can easily convert it once it's done, altough I
cannot think of a place where we'd publish
a plain-text-changelog, apparently we stopped updating the fgdata/NEWS file),
but this will allow us to work together
on a nice release announcement/changelog, so nothing imp
Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for writing. I've got a couple of comments.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Thorsten Renk wrote:
> I get the impression that some people believe that Local Weather is a
> temporary, experimental thing. That's actually not my position. I assigned
> a version number larger t
Hi there,
My partner (works for Virgin Australia) got an email of photos of new liveries
for this low-cost South African carrier, here is a link to some...
http://www.iloveplanes.com/aviation-news/commercial/special-sxswi-edition-saturday-wings-kulula/
Brilliant! Well worthy of an addition o
Simple: Keep the options in the dialog simple, but add a "advanced"
button, so everyone will be happy with the dialog! :D
--
AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric
Ries, the creator of the Le
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
> Okay, it isn't plain text (we can easily convert it once it's done, altough
> I cannot think of a place where we'd publish
> a plain-text-changelog, apparently we stopped updating the fgdata/NEWS
> file), but this will allow us to work togethe
Dear forum,
Could someone tell me how to CALL into action another AI scenario
for example see below!
AI Scenario_1 runs, at some point during the scenario CALL to AI Scenario_2 ;
to RUN (similar to a batch file CALL)
Is this possible?
I need to be able to run several scenarios WH
> I think the one reason for this view is the level of integration with the FG
> core, where you've had to work hard to override the global weather system
> through no fault of your own. I think with better integration, the
> local weather
> package will feel much more part of the whole.
I moved m
12 matches
Mail list logo
