Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched
On 30 Jul 2013, at 21:25, Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com wrote: James - if it's convenient could you pull this to the 2.12.0 release branch please. Done. James -- Get your SQL database under version control now! Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] SimGear build fails
On 31 Jul 2013, at 01:16, Patrick Callahan pat.callah...@gmail.com wrote: Check this out: http://lists.openscenegraph.org/pipermail/osg-users-openscenegraph.org/2013-June/063519.html I believe we've dealt with this issue - at least, I have tweaked Jenkins to build the 3.2.0 release candidate and everything is green. Regards, James -- Get your SQL database under version control now! Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Disable grahpical output in flightgear / interface flightgear server instead of flightgear
Hi, This question has been asked before, but it seems it has never been answered. I have a real aircraft which is accompanied by a few simulated aircrafts. Currently, both types of aircrafts interface their own flightgear instance via the net_fdm and net_ctrl interface, while all flightgear instances are connected together via a local server. I only need the graphical output for the real aircraft and want to disable the unnecessary graphical outputs (to reduce work load). I see two options here: a) disable graphical output for the simulated aircrafts b) send position and attitude directly to the server, instead of sending it to a flightgear instance Is a) achievable without having to patch countless source files of flightgear? Otherwise, how can I send my position and attitude to a flightgear server? Regards, Jonas Rheinmetall Defence Electronics GmbH Brüggeweg 54 - D-28309 Bremen - Tel +49 421 457-01 - Fax +49 421 457-2900 - Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bremen - Register: Amtsgericht Bremen, HRB 9659 Commerzbank AG, Bremen (BLZ 290 400 90) 102213600 - www.rheinmetall-defence.com Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Bodo Garbe - Geschäftsführung: Luitjen Ennenga, Ulrich Sasse, Thorsten Quade -- Get your SQL database under version control now! Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched
Hi all, is there any news on release candidates? I think we did find a few serious bugs last year when people tried the RCs, so we'd better start distributing them before the end of this week... Cheers, Gijs -- Get your SQL database under version control now! Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
