Quoting Vassilii Khachaturov :
For some reason, recently the signal to noise ratio on the atlas-devel
list has diminished virtually to zero due to lots of spam. Can you
please restrict posting to subscribers only?
Althougth I am an admin for the Atlas project, I don't have the password for
After converting FGNetFDM structure(given in net_fdm.cxx) by using
htonf,htond or htonl, do we need to convert the structure into char packets
and send to FGFS. I am using FGFS 0.9.3.
On 11/24/06, Anders Gidenstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, umesh pandey wrote:
What is the
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, umesh pandey wrote:
After converting FGNetFDM structure(given in net_fdm.cxx) by using
htonf,htond or htonl, do we need to convert the structure into char packets
and send to FGFS. I am using FGFS 0.9.3.
Hi!
Well, when you have used hton*() on your struct it should
I have fixed the transparent SenecaII to work with the osg and plib versions
of fg.
The problem was that the prop-discs were using the same material as many other
surfaces. The prop-discs get partly transparent by texture and by animation
dependend of the rpm. That made other surfaces
Very nice indeed :-)
May we already download the work in progress package? If yes, where?
Roberto
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
Hi,
I just noticed, that the outside air temperature indicator of the SenecaII was
relocated due to a patch applied a few days ago.
May I kindly ask to revert this patch to SenecaII.xml because of two reasons:
1. The indicator is now not longer attached to anything and it looks a bit odd
to
Hi Heiko,
Am Montag, 27. November 2006 23:04 schrieb Heiko Schulz:
http://hoerbird.ho.funpic.de/flightgear/ec135.baypo.jpg
Great work so far!
But won't the german police change their color to blue in the near future?
Greetings,
Karsten
* Torsten Dreyer -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:38:
[...] due to a patch applied a few days ago.
^^^ ^^
May I kindly ask to revert this patch
*Which* patch?
Could you please either
(A) mention the file name and (if necessary) revision number, *or*
(B)
Melchior FRANZ writes:
* Torsten Dreyer -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:38:
[...] due to a patch applied a few days ago.
^^^ ^^
May I kindly ask to revert this patch
*Which* patch?
the patch was committed on saturday by erik hofman:
3.
--- Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Torsten Dreyer -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:38:
[...] due to a patch applied a few days ago.
^^^ ^^
May I kindly ask to revert this patch
*Which* patch?
Could you please either
(A) mention the file name and (if
Could you please either
(A) mention the file name and (if necessary) revision number, *or*
(B) submit a patch that reverts whatever you want reverted
I choose (A)
Filename: SenecaII.xml
Current revision: 1.3
Requested revision: 1.2
The comment in the Log says:
...snip...
Tom Markowitz:
* Torsten Dreyer -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 16:52:
Could you please either
(A) mention the file name and (if necessary) revision number, *or*
(B) submit a patch that reverts whatever you want reverted
I choose (A)
Filename: SenecaII.xml
Current revision: 1.3
Requested revision: 1.2
So
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 17:02:
$ cvs diff -r1.3 -r1.2 SenecaII.xml
This also removes Overhead.CockpitLightSwitch,
StrobeInCloudsHull and many other things. What about (B)?
Err ... it adds that back in. But I assume that you have done
that very change in your copy
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 17:08:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 28 November 2006 17:02:
$ cvs diff -r1.3 -r1.2 SenecaII.xml
This also removes Overhead.CockpitLightSwitch,
StrobeInCloudsHull and many other things. What about (B)?
Err ... it adds that back in. But I
Hi Heiko,
great work. Waiting for your cvs-update
Maik
Heiko Schulz schrieb am 27.11.2006 23:04:
..netherless it will come!
Hi,
I wanted to get the Ec 135 to CVS yesterday, but some
days ago I had some ideas to to fix some problems I
had with.
Now I'm working on textures - did I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curtis Olson wrote:
What kind of performance change (better? worse?) did you observer?
Thanks,
Curt.
Well, not so great. At SFO at night in the UFO I see a decrease from
about 60fps with the existing lights to 43 with the OSG version. I
I think I found a bug in flight tracker, my flight path seems to zig zag around
to places I never flew? this does it in Firefox anyone else get the same bug?
http://fgfs.i-net.hu/modules/fgtracker/index.php?FUNCT=FLIGHTFLIGHTID=8553
It zigs off to around Vanuatu then flips over to Brazil at
Now that I am hosting the FlightGear web site with a commercial hosting
service, it becomes quite easy to setup online forums using phpBB2.
I know our development culture is built around mailing lists. I'm sure the
FlightGear community will be decisively split between forums versus mailing
Curtis Olson wrote:
Now that I am hosting the FlightGear web site with a commercial
hosting service, it becomes quite easy to setup online forums using
phpBB2.
I know our development culture is built around mailing lists. I'm
sure the FlightGear community will be decisively split
I'm just fiddling around and anything can be changed, but here is a first
whack.
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/
As Dave said we can setup any structure of categories and forums. Right now
I've created one category with all the forum topics inside, but we could
certainly split things out
And I'm a moron and just wiped out the whole thing 2 seconds ago. Let me
try again ... thanks for your patience ... :-(
Curt.
On 11/28/06, Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just fiddling around and anything can be changed, but here is a first
whack.
A backup communication method might be good, but I'm not keen at
all on the idea of having to look two places for the same kind of
content. My feeling is that it should be one or the other.
Agreed. I think a forum has advantages over say a mailing list. But
then having both might
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 23:01 -0600, Curtis Olson wrote:
And I'm a moron and just wiped out the whole thing 2 seconds ago. Let
me try again ... thanks for your patience ... :-(
Curt.
And this is the biggest argument against forums. They're only
accessable when the server is up and its
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:29:05 +1100, Pigeon wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A backup communication method might be good, but I'm not keen at
all on the idea of having to look two places for the same kind of
content. My feeling is that it should be one or the other.
On 11/28/06, Ron Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And this is the biggest argument against forums. They're only
accessable when the server is up
This is similar with email lists ... you can only post and receive postings
when the list server is running and configured correctly, and
Curtis Olson wrote:
On 11/28/06, *Ron Jensen* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And this is the biggest argument against forums. They're only
accessable when the server is up
This is similar with email lists ... you can only post and receive
postings when the
Pigeon wrote:
Agreed. I think a forum has advantages over say a mailing list. But
then having both might not do any good. It's as hard to argue whether
things should go into the wiki or the manual.
That one is not really difficult to tell, as threre's a clear
distinction.
The Wiki is
27 matches
Mail list logo
