On 1/3/07, Dave Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 03:08 +0100, woodyst wrote:
I've arrived to that conclusion when I saw that the plain wasn't
unable of performing a 0-0 visibility approach with ILS.
The ILS minimums for non CAT II or CAT III approaches are usually no
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Ralf Gerlich wrote:
Disabling joystick inputs alltogether should not be an option, except -
perhaps - if you only disable a single axis. Assume that your AP is in
ALT hold mode and you want to do turns.
You are right about that of course. And using a separate channel is
Hi,
Joacim Persson wrote:
OTOH if we're not that much after exact internal modelling, we might as
well use the trim channel ;-)
The piloting of the aircraft, including AP, should be realistic. In this
case that involves adjusting the pitch trim (manually) -- why there are
warning lights
I just noticed that there might be/is a typo in the ch53e-yasim.xml file.
change:
ground-effect-constatnt=1.25
to:
ground-effect-constant=1.25
Greetings,
Wim
On 1/3/07, wim van hoydonck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I just checked Janes' All the world aircraft (versions 1979-1880 and
Thought I'd share this find -- discovered it just now:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/
Document-ID: 19770018207
Title: US Army helicopter design datcom. Volume 1 Airfoils
Author: Leo Dadone
Abstract:
This report contains airfoil data of interest for rotor
applications. The data is presented
Hi,
Real nice. But from 1976 - newer one would be good
too!
But Maybe this will lead to some nice helos!
Greets
HHS
--- Joacim Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Thought I'd share this find -- discovered it just
now:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/
Document-ID: 19770018207
Title: US Army helicopter
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
Real nice. But from 1976 - newer one would be good
too!
If there is a volume 2 somewhere...
Leo Dadone is a Boeing guy btw, so I suspect the 40-some listed airfoils
should at least cover the Boeing rotorcrafts up to 1977. Many of the
airfoils
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 10:27, woodyst wrote:
It can be fixed in kap140.nas file, I think. I would study that file well
and if I can, I will send another patch.
I've overhauled kap140.nas quite extensively. I've changed to more sensible
property data types like boolenas instead of text.
Look for the naca files on the internet to find them all in a better
format.
I think they actually have them in database or spreadsheet form
somewhere unless they have gotten rid of it.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:24 pm, Joacim Persson wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
Real
On 1/3/07, John Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, some background information. Suppose we are up in the air,
10 nm west of KXYZ airfield (which is colocated with the XYZ vortac).
[snip]
To summarize: With rare exceptions, locations are specified using the
bearing /from/ the reference.
Hi all,
tonight a nice aerotow was performed (thanks to AJ), some winch starts
and the J3 as external cargo with the CH47 (thanks to Joacim).
I will do some clean up in the code, and add the gravity force of the tow...
Maik
Maik Justus schrieb am 01.01.2007 15:57:
Hi Heiko,
I am thinking of
On 01/03/2007 04:00 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
we do want this to work intuitively so I would welcome
any changes to improve the in-air reposition dialog box.
:-)
I think it makes a lot
more sense to focus on the gui dialog box.
Agreed.
I'm coming at this from the perspective of an
I found a way to make it do what I want. Here's my version
http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/location-in-air.xml
and the diff against the cvs version:
http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/location-in-air.diff
On 01/03/2007 05:19 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
Only if you are relocating to a nearby position.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 02:37:09 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:53:21 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 1/2/07, John Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about starting with places like these:
--
Is it just me or does FG currently lack a version parameter for returning
its version number?
Ampere
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 15:36 -0500, John Denker wrote:
First, some background information. Suppose we are up in the air,
10 nm west of KXYZ airfield (which is colocated with the XYZ vortac).
1) If we were inbound to the field, I would report our position
as 10 nm west, inbound on the
On 1/3/07, Ampere K. Hardraade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it just me or does FG currently lack a version parameter for
returning
its version number?
In the old days we just printed the version # to the console when we started
up. A --version options sounds like a good idea to me.
Curt.
--
On 01/03/2007 09:07 PM, Dave Perry wrote:
This may seem a nit. I had the following quote drilled into my mind
by Don Berman in one of his well know Instrument Written Ground School
seminars.
Radials eminate from the station; direction of flight has nothing to
do with location.
1)
18 matches
Mail list logo
