[Flightgear-devel] DME for pa28-161

2007-02-08 Thread Thiago Drechsel
Hi everybody. Does anybody have a patch that includes DME for the Piper Cherokee pa28-161. It's an excelent model, but I miss DME when doing my IFR procedures. Thanks. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Main renderer.cxx, 1.74, 1.75

2007-02-08 Thread Ron Jensen
This patch broke the jpeg server, it used the mSceneCamera. My attached patch changes it to use the mBackGroundCamera. On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 23:32 -0600, Mathias Froehlich wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv17538/src/Main Modified Files:

[Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread Thomas Förster
Hi, I hit on a strange problem when using the --flight-plan commandline option with the default c172. All controls are working except the ailerons, which makes flying around a bit challenging... ;-) command line: fgfs --airport=EDDT --runway=26L --flight-plan=EDDT-EDDC.plan EDDT-EDDC.plan:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] DME for pa28-161

2007-02-08 Thread Ron Jensen
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:32 -0200, Thiago Drechsel wrote: Hi everybody. Does anybody have a patch that includes DME for the Piper Cherokee pa28-161. It's an excelent model, but I miss DME when doing my IFR procedures. Truly bizarre, I fired up this aircraft and saw the radiostack,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 8 February 2007 11:13, Thomas Förster wrote: Hi, I hit on a strange problem when using the --flight-plan commandline option with the default c172. All controls are working except the ailerons, which makes flying around a bit challenging... ;-) command line: fgfs --airport=EDDT

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour

2007-02-08 Thread John Denker
On 02/08/2007 12:35 PM, gh.robin wrote: If it is FG cvs with OSG, it is not a surprise to me, i told before on several topics regarding autopilot, that it is not working. Nobody but Lee answered to confirm that it is not working. The default c172p in the current CVS is messed up in ways

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour

2007-02-08 Thread polly
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:59:02 -0500, John Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I routinely observe 135 Kias at 2850 RPM in level flight at 1000 MSL, using only 13 gph. Is it possible that post-OSG all fdm's are snappier ? I've no hard evidence but I seem to be able to overspeed the c310-ifr much

[Flightgear-devel] Heading , pitch and roll illustrations for fgfs-model-howto.html

2007-02-08 Thread Reagan Thomas
I came upon the TODO asking for illustrations in the 3D Aircraft Models HOWTO and thought that's something I can do now! :) http://139.78.95.188/flightgear/heading.jpg http://139.78.95.188/flightgear/pitch.jpg http://139.78.95.188/flightgear/roll.jpg The reference aircraft is a rendering of the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread Thomas Förster
Am Donnerstag 08 Februar 2007 18:35 schrieb gh.robin: On Thu 8 February 2007 11:13, Thomas Förster wrote: ... If it is FG cvs with OSG, it is not a surprise to me, i told before on several topics regarding autopilot, that it is not working. Nobody but Lee answered to confirm that it is not

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread Martin Spott
gh.robin wrote: On Thu 8 February 2007 11:13, Thomas F?rster wrote: I hit on a strange problem when using the --flight-plan commandline option with the default c172. All controls are working except the ailerons, which makes flying around a bit challenging... ;-) If it is FG cvs with OSG,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread gh.robin
On Thu 8 February 2007 23:09, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: On Thu 8 February 2007 11:13, Thomas F?rster wrote: I hit on a strange problem when using the --flight-plan commandline option with the default c172. All controls are working except the ailerons, which makes flying

[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] patch-cache: simgear/props/props.?xx

2007-02-08 Thread Maik Justus
Hi, the path-cache of sim/flight-gear is not designed for removing nodes. If you remove a node and query it by it's name you probably get this removed node, independent if another node with the same name has been created meanwhile. This due to the path-cache of each node, which stores links

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Textranslate Step and Scroll

2007-02-08 Thread John Denker
On 02/07/2007 02:14 PM, Andy Ross wrote: So if there's a design flaw here, it's at a higher level. Maybe what's really needed is a digit extractor animation instead. Good news: The /design/ is not as flawed as it looks. All evidence indicates that the primary problem with the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread leee
On Thursday 08 February 2007 23:22, gh.robin wrote: On Thu 8 February 2007 23:09, Martin Spott wrote: gh.robin wrote: On Thu 8 February 2007 11:13, Thomas F?rster wrote: I hit on a strange problem when using the --flight-plan commandline option with the default c172. All controls are

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread Durk Talsma
leee wrote: On Thursday 08 February 2007 23:22, gh.robin wrote: Just checked again, with current cvs osg/simgear/flightgear, and I still got the same problems. As before, re-setting the A/P via the menu seems to kick everything into life. There also seems to be a random element to this

Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172p strange behaviour with --flight-plan

2007-02-08 Thread Dave Perry
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 00:25 +, leee wrote: Just checked again, with current cvs osg/simgear/flightgear, and I still got the same problems. As before, re-setting the A/P via the menu seems to kick everything into life. There also seems to be a random element to this problem - in half

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] patch-cache: simgear/props/props.?xx

2007-02-08 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Maik Justus -- Friday 09 February 2007: the path-cache of sim/flight-gear is not designed for removing nodes. Indeed. The possibility to remove nodes was a rather late and never finished feature. And this feature was hardly used for a long time (if at all). I started to use it to remove